Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <bd1c347b-cbf8-3917-401a-ed85c6ccb956@kernel.dk>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2023 11:54:00 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.6.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v3 0/3] blk-cgroup: make sure pd_free_fn() is called
 in order
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>, tj@kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
        josef@toxicpanda.com
Cc:     cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com,
        yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com
References: <20230119110350.2287325-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
In-Reply-To: <20230119110350.2287325-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 1/19/23 4:03 AM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> 
> Changes in v3:
>  - add ack tag from Tejun for patch 1,2
>  - as suggested by Tejun, update commit message and comments in patch 3
> 
> The problem was found in iocost orignally([1]) that ioc can be freed in
> ioc_pd_free(). And later we found that there are more problem in
> iocost([2]).
> 
> After some discussion, as suggested by Tejun([3]), we decide to fix the
> problem that parent pd can be freed before child pd in cgroup layer
> first. And the problem in [1] will be fixed later if this patchset is
> applied.

Doesn't apply against for-6.3/block (or linux-next or my for-next, for
that matter). Can you resend a tested one against for-6.3/block?

-- 
Jens Axboe