Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2023 15:34:54 -0400
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc:     joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
        iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] iommu: The early demise of bus ops
Message-ID: <Y8mbXs0nai1BOxZy@nvidia.com>
References: <cover.1673978700.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cover.1673978700.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: =?us-ascii?Q?7OaN1G2qYO06TTOfh2ZCDWHJbMmdH4Gdcc+DxpCtcxVq+S1fHqY1Ozvmxo48?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?UdwIuw8hMsRGO79EbViuXsOR+BL9LXLPxz75JNA9at7YplU4EsDZXsHEmUwr?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?q99F8RzFdlCjMg1uPuyIzJk6I1tNBBopFm5DkQqkB5WDhrEcWU4MRgibmKPb?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?wIpHUEl5iAIKNniTrQMwvFKIPJ0/p0wfiguOKEtXErJ9JAS4iU+fRv/RGjuZ?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?EzbFqhOHR8dytNHIx7zB3L3TO4gJ2FzsOYzQalMJsJ+0q5VVV69XIK/Nlz2r?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?dZaFQSyUiMKl0Et0oXUE7hu/5Ra98kGu5s/II8wmvB2D18C88QhYaC/IUlcX?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?42io9lTE/Rw8im2pvN6nldnWCQokfYi4LxGSN2ZcFdK8mTQgVhJiBrmnTgfw?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?ZPaZcjyTxqyDWaS8uHXOiiWchgkGHj/ylwopYw1PFBuizrAmHcQn9VTC41+C?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?1zxtfxA7d6qMh47WSTKI5fw3qM0ux7WdSGDzBLysYITCMZr5aW2Yj6V05OGb?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?SVSjIcxhvuqfHZA3bKJ9ub8a27WSMbGodlySk5EV6UpHH7NggWkkHLzexNQz?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?J7gtdliVdTrRy9RryTijDTR4CMVWHWC6/Zu1icscqH1r1KbrmTvYdHj3V79B?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?m1I5/rw6AgHbiBgPd8miDiTN3jkddTysF0kle5zXL9XPekgvrm9wECofdeIL?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?sc16fhDd6dVQNZ2T0KoUxoqBliZsefis4dSWk6Hw28TOtuIlpNhOhULMFXMe?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?/cXeTSgBotY8BytzF9qB++YQFaav1UvRK0/GBTZ13TDqW/kc7I9nHcfgrD5s?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?C58WrVtSvR4bBiD8vTHq+T9ZLItMfm9UnHjo2Gb+OotiTSqLRWMfIAs4YCVe?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?X+kqGrCdEfLF/jAv1FBpsXc4Mpd1Sgl9Kj6epRe2EzBMWW59ztieH/2G9UTq?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?xlzAHZSvn0MVadM3zLmFAiTWy5XkTtPe2z6o375MzmUXmKbfmyHtN6eFj6cH?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?pVOr9OsM2vekfcBrxYNCn6qsUNiTbK154pZB/m8icYuE1DYBYE6Fq4PDlwHK?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?IpI4OZx+K9qukMHuOylqfmW5LTq0q7e4FX5EnraqZ+MXAlTWOJaUWg1Qp2RF?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?XcS4XqMkQomeFSZCJ+8f+sNDSuA3DLsp0jsloA7ytAbVSut7jYFy5lLQS1PM?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?EPUzq/LH/GnI/c4E9q0KJ/ZgCAsDdZSiVss4kTMMovnnzeC42HFS4ZSyq0Tv?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?bB+LBM76us5ieDHzFVD3blMS7+mo1qM1jqbCV5oDQr6rSFzjhwYxAyInyzlj?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?x8PKGSTLOp79TVtWClt0o8FcPlovTNzwD4IMtPRfZtd+zvwApe/wd6xLHCqL?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?6Xcovv2YH/tF52RegU4u7Ltdrt2bj8mT1CyJ5/RmpvVC+hgIGpFlkKGhNlGP?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?b3YnQJS2LxPfQYvnnzdBYOIGvFt6ZpQeD/13WzUKKxbjD7BTtMcA4hk7kgbY?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?NeavnwGhRpI2+Oh/yG9lUx7R45vQ3GXIiNd73LhaCWIlp+x+daU+48nRAAne?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?I66125igl0fUUZfiCsf81JtVeFd7Buvi+PT3k/gO?=
X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e3319e3d-cf68-41fe-d088-08dafa543df7
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: LV2PR12MB5869.namprd12.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jan 2023 19:34:55.0975
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: Qol+vzUBU4axzS1T6TfxdjZmvHw4Nc3amOLiPkCJuhJIsVNTtIp/pyv4ACCgEwbI
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DS7PR12MB6141
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
        DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FORGED_SPF_HELO,
        RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE
        autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 07:18:18PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> [ Christoph, Greg, Rafael; feel free to ignore all the IOMMU details,
>  just a heads-up for some pretty trivial header motion in patch #6 ]
> 
> This is sort of an RFC, in the sense that the patches are functionally
> ready but I don't expect that we necessarily want to merge all them
> right away; at this point it's more for the sake of visibility and
> checking if anyone strongly objects to the direction I'm taking.

Looks good to me

Is there anything beyond some typing preventing the removal of the bus
from the out-of-iommu callers?

> I've based these patches on 6.2-rc3 and made no effort to integrate them
> with the IOMMUFD-related work going on in parallel and/or already
> queued, even though there is some functional intersection and almost
> certain conflicts. If we reach a consensus that we would like any of
> this for 6.3 I'll rebase as appropriate.

I don't see a reason to wait..

Jason