Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230119200553.3922206-1-bgardon@google.com> <Y8mqd7HUzXDnhXLV@google.com>
 <CANgfPd902Sd+LCd61D8=ba2ZTbJCRu3emLXtE212_8NWW6c3Pw@mail.gmail.com> <Y8mt3uv5iF6i/DD1@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <Y8mt3uv5iF6i/DD1@google.com>
From:   Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2023 13:27:32 -0800
Message-ID: <CANgfPd8owr_=va1u4eoH6=anjM0VX_YSU5AyvBJaKjuifojVDA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] selftests: KVM: Move dirty logging functions to memstress.(c|h)
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
        Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:53 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023, Ben Gardon wrote:
> > Woops!
>
> Heh, and top posting too.  Me thinks you had too long of a break ;-)

Oh no, I'm in shambles (^:

>
> > I did not mean to tag this RFC. Sorry about that. I will include a cover
> > letter in the future and can resend these with one if preferred.
>
> Eh, no need, damage done.  I was just confused.

I sent a revised version anyway because I realized it probably made
sense to have test skip itself if TDP MMU or Eager Page Splitting was
disabled.

>
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:39 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Please provide cover letters for multi-patch series, regardless of how trivial
> > > the series is.
> > >
> > > This series especially needs a cover explaining why it's tagged "RFC".