Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <e0a09ca8-2ad8-c519-c47e-4707bfb4fe93@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2023 13:47:04 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.4.2
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/17] Introduce a unified API for SCMI Server testing
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc:     sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
        Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org,
        vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com,
        wleavitt@marvell.com, peter.hilber@opensynergy.com,
        nicola.mazzucato@arm.com, tarek.el-sherbiny@arm.com,
        quic_kshivnan@quicinc.com
References: <20230118121426.492864-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230118121426.492864-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Christian,

On 1/18/23 04:14, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This series aims to introduce a new SCMI unified userspace interface meant
> to ease testing an SCMI Server implementation for compliance, fuzzing etc.,
> from the perspective of the OSPM agent (non-secure world only ...)
> 
> It is proposed as a testing/development facility, it is NOT meant to be a
> feature to use in production, but only enabled in Kconfig for test
> deployments.
> 
> Currently an SCMI Compliance Suite like the one at [1] can only work by
> injecting SCMI messages at the SCMI transport layer using the mailbox test
> driver (CONFIG_MAILBOX_TEST) via its few debugfs entries and looking at
> the related replies from the SCMI backend Server.

Took a while but finally:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>

Any idea when the raw_mode_support or the acs_raw_mode_support will hit 
your master branch in the scmi-tests repository?
-- 
Florian