Received: by 2002:a05:6358:a55:b0:ec:fcf4:3ecf with SMTP id 21csp1966114rwb; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:37:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXuvNHQ0BlfpEcX4D4U3GMAfN4dgZAGt9/xDz5h5zittDdcTaUN2G963Uf34JkoJtKHC94og X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9151:0:b0:582:998a:bed5 with SMTP id 17-20020aa79151000000b00582998abed5mr11732875pfi.23.1674182237949; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:37:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1674182237; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kSdO0RIAXpMNWGqUnRuNgAapwX/K+FpBagNsSPr3Fh4rnfGppx8lS0+e2P7wbnRQAq Kjv+6uJntvngS9Znxlk8ucAiuR9bay7QKv1VVokxugJg2tBPzk7g9aC8Quxbil4VWzRN R6UtcxxGqWdWWyv+wHyq3yU6d7RGiKb/PDRuu/EJd9ZrwnQW5KVgaeD5mI3D+psEstwP CZcIuDpE7l83zhVdk5Q7/FIofq25pwnZG6fNlCV0i0gnvj0miEQzW4jFXDpD6tFfEqW1 Ie4POESTksfv5t5xEkFaJrV4ol3XDid1NdCptc2yUroDHF3gh+8BqOLicW01Q3vxddPQ AGQw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=w3Mh24f3syw1YMuVpvRFLAyGbyazWD5wf6ZyZDnVgNQ=; b=o8vOmnsBPcXzakVL121y9SYE1f9Lh7ZKlCt/CRQapBjtErO2pDT4eUhRd7aHLpK+Rt zf97TrHiattD7KkeFgvumIA4WOJN7wqyUzWmkc5uOkUNo/lkaHZv7jtwQtb/5CRY1drs Fdjz2xMPmczeHF+MIKGwNGlXT9LLwbhmWpNx+/QnuNtQZZKO+a2v4uS9H2waB2XYc3/7 OUmhhRJS4FRCvPW1Ea7EHdfbs0MoT0myPMxSAK9xrd3iqmKEDZSonaatA0pM8nb3TR5B Svyq3i5luXmpv89dSqHHuzMpgonj/9Z26AoQiOscKY4wuYc9bEoHHjg5NZ262wDVue73 WZkQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v29-20020a63b95d000000b004d184dbf598si4280120pgo.519.2023.01.19.18.37.12; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:37:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229613AbjATCTq (ORCPT + 46 others); Thu, 19 Jan 2023 21:19:46 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37310 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229453AbjATCTo (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2023 21:19:44 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f179.google.com (mail-qt1-f179.google.com [209.85.160.179]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC3DD9F3A2; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:19:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-f179.google.com with SMTP id z9so3186778qtv.5; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:19:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=w3Mh24f3syw1YMuVpvRFLAyGbyazWD5wf6ZyZDnVgNQ=; b=r7mhRBF7ys3T5QHmkn/ez80xwb1ELwkOwtnx7W4b5lpt48nULRJQCG//TYuOOG0djw l4dAAW47OcxFi1FqtKuwEehfPoibkE5HD+Wg+xHOfeEFa6OuCCZ4FMtJbxJjcKSgl+Xr fgowi0F+qNukPGRA6aqEjxZnGAKQXp6WOKw3FfCore4K+0Bi1MFVdbKPcieCUtXZxFUR 03YgPCUrYcgf9Fgev4GIcxbjbeKERCcyYyh+x4hWT8S2WTI1ap3PPQ5c/7EU4a1M9nox 6zwnZF/dFcFDzzGTdosDTBMi0ABEyjlp2xlnibNJO4ke0RUOeZcmDyiAn4cb2BqNG/GO 5OqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krMFBKOsYRSCoxdiqBf5JEnewvk7qCA2f6AU2foparavaoGzS+B zKiMqW3fay/4eCk/oawWLdnOqlapySq2ZTsh X-Received: by 2002:ac8:44ac:0:b0:3a5:f9f8:3ec4 with SMTP id a12-20020ac844ac000000b003a5f9f83ec4mr16390621qto.30.1674181181587; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:19:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2620:10d:c091:480::1:2fc9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d25-20020ac85459000000b003b630456b8fsm6957275qtq.89.2023.01.19.18.19.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:19:41 -0800 (PST) From: David Vernet To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@meta.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Use __failure macro in task kfunc testsuite Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 20:18:44 -0600 Message-Id: <20230120021844.3048244-1-void@manifault.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In commit 537c3f66eac1 ("selftests/bpf: add generic BPF program tester-loader"), a new mechanism was added to the BPF selftest framework to allow testsuites to use macros to define expected failing testcases. This allows any testsuite which tests verification failure to remove a good amount of boilerplate code. This patch updates the task_kfunc selftest suite to use these new macros. Signed-off-by: David Vernet --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c | 71 +------------------ .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c | 18 +++++ 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c index 18848c31e36f..f79fa5bc9a8d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/task_kfunc.c @@ -9,9 +9,6 @@ #include "task_kfunc_failure.skel.h" #include "task_kfunc_success.skel.h" -static size_t log_buf_sz = 1 << 20; /* 1 MB */ -static char obj_log_buf[1048576]; - static struct task_kfunc_success *open_load_task_kfunc_skel(void) { struct task_kfunc_success *skel; @@ -83,67 +80,6 @@ static const char * const success_tests[] = { "test_task_from_pid_invalid", }; -static struct { - const char *prog_name; - const char *expected_err_msg; -} failure_tests[] = { - {"task_kfunc_acquire_untrusted", "R1 must be referenced or trusted"}, - {"task_kfunc_acquire_fp", "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point"}, - {"task_kfunc_acquire_unsafe_kretprobe", "reg type unsupported for arg#0 function"}, - {"task_kfunc_acquire_trusted_walked", "R1 must be referenced or trusted"}, - {"task_kfunc_acquire_null", "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point"}, - {"task_kfunc_acquire_unreleased", "Unreleased reference"}, - {"task_kfunc_get_non_kptr_param", "arg#0 expected pointer to map value"}, - {"task_kfunc_get_non_kptr_acquired", "arg#0 expected pointer to map value"}, - {"task_kfunc_get_null", "arg#0 expected pointer to map value"}, - {"task_kfunc_xchg_unreleased", "Unreleased reference"}, - {"task_kfunc_get_unreleased", "Unreleased reference"}, - {"task_kfunc_release_untrusted", "arg#0 is untrusted_ptr_or_null_ expected ptr_ or socket"}, - {"task_kfunc_release_fp", "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point"}, - {"task_kfunc_release_null", "arg#0 is ptr_or_null_ expected ptr_ or socket"}, - {"task_kfunc_release_unacquired", "release kernel function bpf_task_release expects"}, - {"task_kfunc_from_pid_no_null_check", "arg#0 is ptr_or_null_ expected ptr_ or socket"}, - {"task_kfunc_from_lsm_task_free", "reg type unsupported for arg#0 function"}, -}; - -static void verify_fail(const char *prog_name, const char *expected_err_msg) -{ - LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts); - struct task_kfunc_failure *skel; - int err, i; - - opts.kernel_log_buf = obj_log_buf; - opts.kernel_log_size = log_buf_sz; - opts.kernel_log_level = 1; - - skel = task_kfunc_failure__open_opts(&opts); - if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "task_kfunc_failure__open_opts")) - goto cleanup; - - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(failure_tests); i++) { - struct bpf_program *prog; - const char *curr_name = failure_tests[i].prog_name; - - prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(skel->obj, curr_name); - if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "bpf_object__find_program_by_name")) - goto cleanup; - - bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, !strcmp(curr_name, prog_name)); - } - - err = task_kfunc_failure__load(skel); - if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "unexpected load success")) - goto cleanup; - - if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(obj_log_buf, expected_err_msg), "expected_err_msg")) { - fprintf(stderr, "Expected err_msg: %s\n", expected_err_msg); - fprintf(stderr, "Verifier output: %s\n", obj_log_buf); - } - -cleanup: - task_kfunc_failure__destroy(skel); -} - void test_task_kfunc(void) { int i; @@ -155,10 +91,5 @@ void test_task_kfunc(void) run_success_test(success_tests[i]); } - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(failure_tests); i++) { - if (!test__start_subtest(failure_tests[i].prog_name)) - continue; - - verify_fail(failure_tests[i].prog_name, failure_tests[i].expected_err_msg); - } + RUN_TESTS(task_kfunc_failure); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c index 1b47b94dbca0..e6950d6a9cf0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ #include #include +#include "bpf_misc.h" #include "task_kfunc_common.h" char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; @@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ static struct __tasks_kfunc_map_value *insert_lookup_task(struct task_struct *ta } SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask") +__failure __msg("R1 must be referenced or trusted") int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_untrusted, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) { struct task_struct *acquired; @@ -44,6 +46,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_untrusted, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_f } SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask") +__failure __msg("arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point") int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_fp, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) { struct task_struct *acquired, *stack_task = (struct task_struct *)&clone_flags; @@ -56,6 +59,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_fp, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) } SEC("kretprobe/free_task") +__failure __msg("reg type unsupported for arg#0 function") int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_unsafe_kretprobe, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) { struct task_struct *acquired; @@ -68,6 +72,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_unsafe_kretprobe, struct task_struct *task, u64 } SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask") +__failure __msg("R1 must be referenced or trusted") int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_trusted_walked, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) { struct task_struct *acquired; @@ -81,6 +86,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_trusted_walked, struct task_struct *task, u64 cl SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask") +__failure __msg("arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point") int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_null, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) { struct task_struct *acquired; @@ -95,6 +101,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_null, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) } SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask") +__failure __msg("Unreleased reference") int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_unreleased, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) { struct task_struct *acquired; @@ -107,6 +114,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_acquire_unreleased, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_ } SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask") +__failure __msg("arg#0 expected pointer to map value") int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_get_non_kptr_param, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) { struct task_struct *kptr; @@ -122,6 +130,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_get_non_kptr_param, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_ } SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask") +__failure __msg("arg#0 expected pointer to map value") int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_get_non_kptr_acquired, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) { struct task_struct *kptr, *acquired; @@ -140,6 +149,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_get_non_kptr_acquired, struct task_struct *task, u64 clo } SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask") +__failure __msg("arg#0 expected pointer to map value") int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_get_null, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) { struct task_struct *kptr; @@ -155,6 +165,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_get_null, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) } SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask") +__failure __msg("Unreleased reference") int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_xchg_unreleased, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) { struct task_struct *kptr; @@ -174,6 +185,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_xchg_unreleased, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_fla } SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask") +__failure __msg("Unreleased reference") int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_get_unreleased, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) { struct task_struct *kptr; @@ -193,6 +205,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_get_unreleased, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flag } SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask") +__failure __msg("arg#0 is untrusted_ptr_or_null_ expected ptr_ or socket") int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_release_untrusted, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) { struct __tasks_kfunc_map_value *v; @@ -208,6 +221,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_release_untrusted, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_f } SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask") +__failure __msg("arg#0 pointer type STRUCT task_struct must point") int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_release_fp, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) { struct task_struct *acquired = (struct task_struct *)&clone_flags; @@ -219,6 +233,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_release_fp, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) } SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask") +__failure __msg("arg#0 is ptr_or_null_ expected ptr_ or socket") int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_release_null, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) { struct __tasks_kfunc_map_value local, *v; @@ -251,6 +266,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_release_null, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) } SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask") +__failure __msg("release kernel function bpf_task_release expects") int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_release_unacquired, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) { /* Cannot release trusted task pointer which was not acquired. */ @@ -260,6 +276,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_release_unacquired, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_ } SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask") +__failure __msg("arg#0 is ptr_or_null_ expected ptr_ or socket") int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_from_pid_no_null_check, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) { struct task_struct *acquired; @@ -273,6 +290,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_from_pid_no_null_check, struct task_struct *task, u64 cl } SEC("lsm/task_free") +__failure __msg("reg type unsupported for arg#0 function") int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_from_lsm_task_free, struct task_struct *task) { struct task_struct *acquired; -- 2.39.0