Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764992AbXHXVmV (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:42:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763361AbXHXVlz (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:41:55 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:44108 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762321AbXHXVly (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:41:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20070824.144153.48812936.davem@davemloft.net> To: jengelh@computergmbh.de Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: errno codes intertwined From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.52 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 574 Lines: 15 From: Jan Engelhardt Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:24:48 +0200 (CEST) > So I'm just asking: can I rely on the same errno across Linuxes? > And should the errno values be fixed up? You cannot rely on error numbers being the same, every architecture has something to a few to many differences in this area. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/