From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 2/2] Hibernation: Arbitrary boot kernel support on x86_64
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 20:27:25 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
References: <200708241206.57178.rjw@sisk.pl> <200708241211.55319.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070824204632.GA5008@ucw.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20070824204632.GA5008@ucw.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200708252027.26721.rjw@sisk.pl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 877
Lines: 24

On Friday, 24 August 2007 22:46, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > 
> > Make it possible to restore a hibernation image on x86_64 with the help of a
> > kernel different from the one in the image.
> > 
> > The idea is to split the core restoration code into two separate parts and to
> > place each of them in a different page. ?The first part belongs to the boot
> 
> What happens in case where both parts want to be
> at the same place? (Like kernel being restored is 4KB smaller, so that
> routines now collide?)

Bad things, but I can't see how to avoid that reliably.

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/