Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756136AbXH0Lfx (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 07:35:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754356AbXH0Lfp (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 07:35:45 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.224]:54902 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754860AbXH0Lfo (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 07:35:44 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rCXNfnTooX1j3XPVg423FDwVx6vXw/Odz+L9FvlKDzuY5biLGHsnkQ6J42+fvUJdEwEU6CcwsL/WF7O7qsudfYUyI0iqBqIg/Q/xJnuScfoDjibfi9LkKzV/1I/OT8EmzOgsYpONa53kPIXG6l7z7qH4YFmeD0v8QkFvMAV7upE= Message-ID: <6bffcb0e0708270435m1554bb72k7e0c287916d0f836@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:35:42 +0200 From: "Michal Piotrowski" To: "Jeff Garzik" Subject: Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) Cc: "Andrew Morton" , "Daniel Walker" , "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Steinbrink?=" , eranian@hpl.hp.com, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Natalie Protasevich" In-Reply-To: <46D29C3D.5070801@garzik.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1186531609.22044.50.camel@imap.mvista.com> <20070808142059.GF30805@atjola.homenet> <1187628296.7732.14.camel@imap.mvista.com> <46CDE94A.7000600@googlemail.com> <1187904169.2435.83.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com> <46D21E8E.4000003@googlemail.com> <20070827005131.b93f5935.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <46D29C3D.5070801@garzik.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1194 Lines: 34 On 27/08/07, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just > > getting lost. Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting > > transitioned into bugzilla for tracking? > > Maybe this was a dumb assumption on my part, but I thought regressions > were getting rolled over into the next release's list, if they are not > solved? I have tried to track all regressions, but it is a lot of work, so I center on development kernels. There are two lists (both unmaintained) http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions_2622 http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions_2621 If you compare them, you will see "New regressions (submitted after 2.6.21 a.k.a. for -stable team)" - a long list of problems reported after 2.6.21 release. I really do not have time to track issues in stable releases. Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/