Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756674AbXH0PMP (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:12:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751231AbXH0PMA (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:12:00 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]:46578 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750811AbXH0PL7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:11:59 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TeKbulGtCP2YFzc/l69EbL2y1LNSwU9WObaYvml/+xcMwy7cuJywrRxYIK5Y55lOiJcaeIjRkowx94mJhVL4w17Vo2G8qupOhAONQqXePNoyI8eknvID8x53Aa/2ZCnMqs2WyG5VJRPs1mYyoJHRE6RubP6YrFoM3Qk1QoKxp4Q= Message-ID: <6bffcb0e0708270811t645e5794pdd76596f71f1ba7e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:11:55 +0200 From: "Michal Piotrowski" To: "Daniel Walker" Subject: Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) Cc: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Steinbrink?=" , eranian@hpl.hp.com, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1188225567.2435.188.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1186531609.22044.50.camel@imap.mvista.com> <20070808142059.GF30805@atjola.homenet> <1187628296.7732.14.camel@imap.mvista.com> <46CDE94A.7000600@googlemail.com> <1187904169.2435.83.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com> <46D21E8E.4000003@googlemail.com> <1188225567.2435.188.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1776 Lines: 56 On 27/08/07, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 02:45 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Daniel Walker pisze: > > [snip] > > > Have you considered maintaining all the lists in Bugzilla? > > > > Yes, I have considered it. > > > > Bugzilla sucks when it comes to tracking things. There is > > a regression field, but there are no difference between > > 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 regression. > > > > Most people are reporting bugs through LKML: > > - 23 regressions with reference to LKML > > - 4 regressions with reference to Bugzilla > > The main reason that I commented on this was because of your comment > below in the release emails, > > Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. > http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions > > And I was thinking, if these bugz need to transition over the bugzilla > anyway why not go straight there instead of via kernelnewbies .. People > would just get bugzilla accounts and open new bugz entry. Some people hates Bugzilla, and they do not want to use it. > > I not trying to force you into something , and ultimately it whatever is > easier for you.. Which was my main reason for commenting on it. > > > > If you had a > > > search of open bugs they would just fall of the list as they get > > > closed.. > > > > Unfortunately, the world is not perfect. > > I think over time it would work like that , but I'm sure there's lots of > people who don't care about our bugzilla .. > > Daniel > > Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/