Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757265AbXH0P03 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:26:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755352AbXH0P0W (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:26:22 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.225]:32973 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755255AbXH0P0V (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:26:21 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VADq1IoneBZdBK8aXQN1Ux59Nf+sd8qZ7Qxjth58Tccp4wsCZAVr/pha5iwZvNPtt/kUKd9CP2G3v+s/W+h2QcDG+6PBPpByegyU9151rmqGFvb4NeJCsTk8ayI9YsHHsNg/Blm5zKWx/jmabi+yDRyhXcCMhYOdjYwP81zsZ4k= Message-ID: <6bffcb0e0708270826p7a7fb044re53d0db4094bc3d5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:26:19 +0200 From: "Michal Piotrowski" To: "Daniel Walker" Subject: Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) Cc: "Andrew Morton" , "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Steinbrink?=" , eranian@hpl.hp.com, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Natalie Protasevich" In-Reply-To: <1188227585.2435.192.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1186531609.22044.50.camel@imap.mvista.com> <20070808142059.GF30805@atjola.homenet> <1187628296.7732.14.camel@imap.mvista.com> <46CDE94A.7000600@googlemail.com> <1187904169.2435.83.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com> <46D21E8E.4000003@googlemail.com> <20070827005131.b93f5935.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <6bffcb0e0708270438j4c92a0b4m1396b4010f25bfb5@mail.gmail.com> <1188227585.2435.192.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1147 Lines: 35 On 27/08/07, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 13:38 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > On 27/08/07, Andrew Morton wrote: [..] > > > I'm not sure that we need one, really. Any bugs in a stable release can be > > > handled via email and/or bugzilla as we are presently doing? > > > > > > What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just > > > getting lost. Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting > > > transitioned into bugzilla for tracking? > > > > I can copy all regression reports into Bugzilla after each release. > > Should we get the regression field fix before? Or had you planned on > just bypassing that completely ? IMO solution proposed by David http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/27/21 seems to be most reasonable. > > Daniel > > Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/