Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762223AbXH0QTm (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:19:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760423AbXH0QJS (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:09:18 -0400 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:53234 "EHLO mailhub.stusta.mhn.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760154AbXH0QJQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:09:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:09:16 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Andrew Morton , Michal Piotrowski , Daniel Walker , =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJu?= Steinbrink , eranian@hpl.hp.com, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Natalie Protasevich Subject: Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) Message-ID: <20070827160916.GF4121@stusta.de> References: <1186531609.22044.50.camel@imap.mvista.com> <20070808142059.GF30805@atjola.homenet> <1187628296.7732.14.camel@imap.mvista.com> <46CDE94A.7000600@googlemail.com> <1187904169.2435.83.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com> <46D21E8E.4000003@googlemail.com> <20070827005131.b93f5935.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <46D29C3D.5070801@garzik.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46D29C3D.5070801@garzik.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1361 Lines: 35 On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 05:41:17AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: >> What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just >> getting lost. Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting >> transitioned into bugzilla for tracking? > > Maybe this was a dumb assumption on my part, but I thought regressions were > getting rolled over into the next release's list, if they are not solved? Judging from the regression lists and the regression reports we get post-release both on lkml and in the kernel Bugzilla we have much more than 100 unfixed regressions since 2.6.20 (plus regressions from older kernels...). Tracking that many regressions is one problem (although getting all bug reports in Bugzilla would make this quite easy), but the bigger problem is how to get them debugged and resolved. > Jeff cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/