Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 17:16:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 17:15:56 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:15377 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 17:15:51 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [OT] fputc vs putc Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium Date: 9 Dec 2001 14:15:22 -0800 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: <9v0npq$qn$1@cesium.transmeta.com> In-Reply-To: <9uvaqn$u4s$1@cesium.transmeta.com> <20011209141408.A17671@zero> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2001 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Followup to: <20011209141408.A17671@zero> By author: Tom Vier In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > according to the putc man page in debian stable, it takes the same args as > fputc. maybe it varies by glibc version (mine is 2.1.3-19). i guess anyone > using putc better use autoconf. also, "unix system programming for SVr4" > says the only difference is that putc is an inlined macro version of fputc. > Nevermind. I was thinking about putc() and putchar(), additionally confused by the annoying fact that fputs() is to putc() as puts() is to putchar()... makes no fscking sense. -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/