Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932608AbXH0RkQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:40:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756473AbXH0Rj4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:39:56 -0400 Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.144]:43353 "EHLO e4.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932340AbXH0Rjy (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:39:54 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Implement emulator_write_phys() From: Anthony Liguori To: Avi Kivity Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <46D3095A.6020305@qumranet.com> References: <11882278064002-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <1188227808405-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <46D2F1B7.70604@qumranet.com> <1188235419.6364.2.camel@squirrel> <46D3095A.6020305@qumranet.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: IBM Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:39:51 -0500 Message-Id: <1188236391.6364.14.camel@squirrel> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.11.90 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1885 Lines: 53 On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 20:26 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 18:45 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > > > >> Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> > >>> Since a hypercall may span two pages and is a gva, we need a function to write > >>> to a gva that may span multiple pages. emulator_write_phys() seems like the > >>> logical choice for this. > >>> > >>> @@ -962,8 +962,35 @@ static int emulator_write_std(unsigned long addr, > >>> unsigned int bytes, > >>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu > >>> > >> I think that emulator_write_emulated(), except for being awkwardly > >> named, should do the job. We have enough APIs. > >> > >> But! We may not overwrite the hypercall instruction while a vcpu may be > >> executing, since there's no atomicity guarantee for code fetch. We have > >> to to be out of guest mode while writing that insn. > >> > > > > > > Hrm, good catch. > > > > How can we get out of guest mode given SMP guest support? > > > > > > kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() is something that can be generalized. > Basically, you set a bit in each vcpu and send an IPI to take them out. > > But that's deadlock prone and complex. Maybe you can just take > kvm->lock, zap the mmu and the flush tlbs, and patch the instruction at > your leisure, as no vcpu will be able to map memory until the lock is > released. This works for shadow paging but not necessarily with NPT. Do code fetches really not respect atomic writes? We could switch to a 32-bit atomic operation and that should result in no worse than the code being patched twice. Regards, Anthony Liguori - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/