Message-ID: <c1d233b9-bc85-dce9-ffa0-eb3170602c6c@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:49:00 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.6.1
Subject: Re: Calculating array sizes in C - was: Re: Build
 regressions/improvements in v6.2-rc1
To:     "Michael.Karcher" <Michael.Karcher@fu-berlin.de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
        linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
        Michael Karcher <kernel@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
References: <CAHk-=wgf929uGOVpiWALPyC7pv_9KbwB2EAvQ3C4woshZZ5zqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20221227082932.798359-1-geert@linux-m68k.org>
 <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2212270933530.311423@ramsan.of.borg>
 <c05bee5d-0d69-289b-fe4b-98f4cd31a4f5@physik.fu-berlin.de>
 <CAMuHMdXNJveXHeS=g-aHbnxtyACxq1wCeaTg8LbpYqJTCqk86g@mail.gmail.com>
 <3800eaa8-a4da-b2f0-da31-6627176cb92e@physik.fu-berlin.de>
 <CAMuHMdWbBRkhecrqcir92TgZnffMe8ku2t7PcVLqA6e6F-j=iw@mail.gmail.com>
 <429140e0-72fe-c91c-53bc-124d33ab5ffa@physik.fu-berlin.de>
 <CAMuHMdWpHSsAB3WosyCVgS6+t4pU35Xfj3tjmdCDoyS2QkS7iw@mail.gmail.com>
 <0d238f02-4d78-6f14-1b1b-f53f0317a910@physik.fu-berlin.de>
 <1732342f-49fe-c20e-b877-bc0a340e1a50@fu-berlin.de>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
In-Reply-To: <1732342f-49fe-c20e-b877-bc0a340e1a50@fu-berlin.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Michael!

On 1/19/23 23:11, Michael.Karcher wrote:
> I suggest to file a bug against gcc complaining about a "spurious warning",
> and using "-Werror -Wno-error-sizeof-pointer-div" until gcc is adapted to
> not emit the warning about the pointer division if the result is not used.

Could you post a kernel patch for that? I would be happy to test it on my
SH-7785CLR board. Also, I'm going to file a bug report against GCC.

Adrian

-- 
  .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
   `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913