Message-ID: <9a1c7959-4b8c-94df-a3e2-e69be72bfd7d@huaweicloud.com>
Date:   Sun, 22 Jan 2023 16:24:21 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.7.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix data race in mark_rt_mutex_waiters
Content-Language: en-US
To:     paulmck@kernel.org, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
        longman@redhat.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, akpm@osdl.org,
        tglx@linutronix.de, joel@joelfernandes.org,
        stern@rowland.harvard.edu, diogo.behrens@huawei.com,
        jonas.oberhauser@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Hernan Ponce de Leon <hernanl.leon@huawei.com>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230120135525.25561-1-hernan.poncedeleon@huaweicloud.com>
 <562c883b-b2c3-3a27-f045-97e7e3281e0b@linux.intel.com>
 <20230120155439.GI2948950@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
From:   Hernan Ponce de Leon <hernan.poncedeleon@huaweicloud.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230120155439.GI2948950@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 1/20/2023 4:54 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 06:58:20AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> On 1/20/2023 5:55 AM, Hernan Ponce de Leon wrote:
>>> From: Hernan Ponce de Leon <hernanl.leon@huawei.com>
>>>
>>
>>>    kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 2 +-
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
>>> index 010cf4e6d0b8..7ed9472edd48 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
>>> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static __always_inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
>>>    	unsigned long owner, *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner;
>>>    	do {
>>> -		owner = *p;
>>> +		owner = READ_ONCE(*p);
>>>    	} while (cmpxchg_relaxed(p, owner,
>>
>>
>> I don't see how this makes any difference at all.
>> *p can be read a dozen times and it's fine; cmpxchg has barrier semantics for compilers afaics
> 
> Doing so does suppress a KCSAN warning.  You could also use data_race()
> if it turns out that the volatile semantics would prevent a valuable
> compiler optimization.

I think the import question is "is this a harmful data race (and needs 
to be fixed as proposed by the patch) or a harmless one (and we should 
use data_race() to silence tools)?".

In https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/1/22/160 I describe how this data race can 
affect important ordering guarantees for the rest of the code. For this 
reason I consider it a harmful one. If this is not the case, I would 
appreciate some feedback or pointer to resources about what races care 
to avoid spamming the mailing list in the future.

Hernan