Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9B7C05027 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 09:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231506AbjAWJjl (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2023 04:39:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39478 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229514AbjAWJjj (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2023 04:39:39 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CBCD1630E for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 01:38:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1674466731; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ixSJusIFQ4NVoWX42WPNCvu85KHc9tvBEAxhegQcVhQ=; b=MWaRlY0pLtDIB2y+t5MY3lSE9UyE4vCbHfCO/4fk9Tk09nmYRN6nUTuFo2xf3jPuB7RhlA o2/ZAQtsfn8o3hG2HKoBjzSyYVpzsHUACSgCCvoKLSyV7ayYtTWc+1KGlpjs1mM5jb+Wql XhgsEvLx6xjDUb7sCllGcucfUB7r78w= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-493-SYChFTcDOrG4mOHNetySMw-1; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 04:38:48 -0500 X-MC-Unique: SYChFTcDOrG4mOHNetySMw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98F61802BEE; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 09:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.33.36.23]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1054A492C3C; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 09:38:45 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <20230120175556.3556978-1-dhowells@redhat.com> <20230120175556.3556978-5-dhowells@redhat.com> To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Al Viro , Matthew Wilcox , Jens Axboe , Jan Kara , Jeff Layton , Logan Gunthorpe , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/8] block: Rename BIO_NO_PAGE_REF to BIO_PAGE_REFFED and invert the meaning MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3668656.1674466725.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 09:38:45 +0000 Message-ID: <3668657.1674466725@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig wrote: > ... I've put together a version of this series that implements this and = my > other suggestions here: > = > http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/shortlog/refs/heads/dio-pin-= pages > = > This also tests fine with xfs and btrfs and nvme passthrough I/O. That looks okay. Do you need to put a Co-developed-by tag on the "block: invert BIO_NO_PAGE_REF" patch? Should I take that set of patches and send it on to Linus when the window opens? Or should it go through the block tree? David