Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 01:56:55 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/8] block: Rename BIO_NO_PAGE_REF to BIO_PAGE_REFFED
 and invert the meaning
Message-ID: <Y85Z511xeGSwmlhG@infradead.org>
References: <Y8vi8/sCvOxvLzzc@infradead.org>
 <20230120175556.3556978-1-dhowells@redhat.com>
 <20230120175556.3556978-5-dhowells@redhat.com>
 <3668657.1674466725@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3668657.1674466725@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 09:38:45AM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> That looks okay.  Do you need to put a Co-developed-by tag on the "block:
> invert BIO_NO_PAGE_REF" patch?

I can do if you want, although there's really not much left of the
original.

> Should I take that set of patches and send it on to Linus when the window
> opens?  Or should it go through the block tree?

I think the block tree would be better.