Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2A4C25B50 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231833AbjAWLVX (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2023 06:21:23 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56492 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231566AbjAWLVV (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2023 06:21:21 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E5FEE061; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 03:21:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id y1so5954359wru.2; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 03:21:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NQ6F7ByEyXvgljzDRhRD+1sz/yBJjJzITDLGLQ6hLZU=; b=M6pzUXi97lLe5CYbkWn2+KGor77imMV4cmfzdqss7U3wsnK9vCQAZibugu9ETkXaT6 ltol4zbtJtGjQyO2QpmVOm4p/7R2QnACbsOpwsnEsiBPP7kFUQS4moq1XlUw6WK7tjFE D3E0If3TNy/GE2TAippT7pK0p5hoPpAkbViFRHg4vT5TxVChjnTmnODRTmfGv4O0+yOq 2nzHk2j1QlDUHlI1JJ7lxY4cSdKXXnk4GpJQnBhYo3OXpCmTs5iHEefAWAFhoWeafU4Q Rab/PgbnXM71qHEcPGpVb8LbFKmmkMx6ip4ymRajcmB49YVxkWJQkc4H3NkvtMz4sh/t KX3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=NQ6F7ByEyXvgljzDRhRD+1sz/yBJjJzITDLGLQ6hLZU=; b=37Beck0RmCycb2WiXIGxPPUaX92VisJKl6G5gBFngGP4iZ1kpIZcaJR9QmssqESkFi scIJkSpi99wkiyiDNvRxnY2sGiNtik0OK+h3m6xUnQ9wp3FN8W2cWzr33kozidrUevPC CkAU+2BxKePTLcKcM2Njj20CIk0SZ44X+AcCfCrjfXV3e9PokorjJXCJmILxkYpGLhdp s3N0tWP52yPOVULcyiHXiHmy9Rk5yA3GP6CJyNdKGuoBFjjqLPafkmdtBYvuxu1u3Va+ Pk32iLJFngflM4ytHndV+Wlv9fRtCp5HbKziZTnOlj8jz81NzX9oaUY23PxtFonplbeg Cr1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kr+yiZoIyLrP9Whfz3+Eoq+ZTYRyLczES41ewi3eApqENRYvehz /87J3Z1hplb6aGggjbwweeU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXvk1U0ANXNTh0jAyGxCB5b5XB0odlB2XbaDvisVSZcyC1Nw5JvRCfNbrL9ll7DlBXzERy67Sw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5107:0:b0:2be:1b37:7f46 with SMTP id s7-20020a5d5107000000b002be1b377f46mr16759745wrt.71.1674472877971; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 03:21:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o2-20020a5d58c2000000b002bdbead763csm31343788wrf.95.2023.01.23.03.21.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 23 Jan 2023 03:21:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:21:15 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230122150219.557984692@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230122150219.557984692@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 04:03:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.271 release. > There are 37 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:02:08 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230113): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 115 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2694 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip