Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01754C54E94 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 13:43:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231634AbjAWNno (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2023 08:43:44 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33498 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229580AbjAWNnn (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jan 2023 08:43:43 -0500 Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net (relay11.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc4:8::231]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD77C22A37; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 05:43:41 -0800 (PST) Received: (Authenticated sender: didi.debian@cknow.org) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC8A8100006; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 13:43:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Diederik de Haas To: Wim Van Sebroeck , "open list:WATCHDOG DEVICE DRIVERS" , open list , Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Fix full name of the GPL Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 14:43:27 +0100 Message-ID: <2281101.Yu7Ql3qPJb@prancing-pony> Organization: Connecting Knowledge In-Reply-To: References: <20230122191345.58989-1-didi.debian@cknow.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1961361.WSzfceE71T"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nextPart1961361.WSzfceE71T Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; protected-headers="v1" From: Diederik de Haas Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Fix full name of the GPL Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 14:43:27 +0100 Message-ID: <2281101.Yu7Ql3qPJb@prancing-pony> Organization: Connecting Knowledge In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Sunday, 22 January 2023 20:45:13 CET Guenter Roeck wrote: > No. The only acceptable change would be to replace the text with the > SPDX license identifier. However, the code is not specific declaring > _which_ license is being used (2.0 only or 2.0+ or even 1.0+). > Given that, the only entity who can change the license text in this > file would be the license holder (which is presumably why it wasn't > touched when the SPDX conversion was made). You are entirely correct and my initial view of it as a spelling issue, was wrong. Please disregard the patch. --nextPart1961361.WSzfceE71T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQT1sUPBYsyGmi4usy/XblvOeH7bbgUCY86O/wAKCRDXblvOeH7b brPSAQDGDCineYMC/SWUOr7iPkc4153C8NXajsSPGJdv8dIv8wD/ccVs7720J0TF lvv8B1uGOH+jH/RhRcaEoS1IRaK3Lgg= =dDwY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1961361.WSzfceE71T--