Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760092AbXH1Qq3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:46:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758981AbXH1Qp7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:45:59 -0400 Received: from DSL022.labridge.com ([206.117.136.22]:3561 "EHLO perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756854AbXH1Qp4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:45:56 -0400 Subject: Re: [NET]: Mark Paul Moore as maintainer of labelled networking. From: Joe Perches To: Paul Moore Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , netdev@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20070828130813.E6A1D39C199@ldl.fc.hp.com> References: <200708280001.l7S01Cxt004543@hera.kernel.org> <1188283579.6062.12.camel@localhost> <20070828130813.E6A1D39C199@ldl.fc.hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:45:50 -0700 Message-Id: <1188319550.6062.31.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2-2.1mdv2007.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1584 Lines: 52 On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 08:46 -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > If having both a labeled networking and NetLabel maintainer entry is a > problem then how about the patch below? I don't think it is. > -NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel, CIPSO, Labeled IPsec, SECMARK) > +NETWORKING [LABELED] (NetLabel/CIPSO, Labeled IPsec, SECMARK) > P: Paul Moore > M: paul.moore@hp.com > +W: http://netlabel.sf.net (NetLabel/CIPSO) > L: netdev@vger.kernel.org > S: Maintained My preference would be for something like: NETLABEL and CIPSO P: Paul Moore M: paul.moore@hp.com W: http://netlabel.sf.net L: netdev@vger.kernel.org S: Maintained F: Documentation/netlabel/ F: include/net/netlabel.h F: net/netlabel/ Labeled IPsec and SECMARK P: Paul Moore M: paul.moore@hp.com L: netdev@vger.kernel.org S: Supported F: include/linux/netfilter/*SECMARK* F: net/netfilter/*SECMARK* I would like to add appropriate file patterns for each block. Also, I'm not sure of the Supported/Maintained status of each block. The distinction is supposed to be: Supported: Someone is actually paid to look after this. Maintained: Someone actually looks after it. Could you please clarify those for me? cheers, Joe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/