Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2023 09:20:23 +0000
From:   Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Clean up a return statement
Message-ID: <Y8+i14h0bfo3aOeb@e120937-lin>
References: <Y86im5M49p3ePGxj@kili>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y86im5M49p3ePGxj@kili>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 06:07:07PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The comments say "enabled" where "disabled" is intended.  Also it's
> cleaner to return zero explicitly instead of ret.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> index d21c7eafd641..703f16ef3953 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> @@ -2739,8 +2739,8 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  				if (ret)
>  					goto clear_dev_req_notifier;
>  
> -				/* Bail out anyway when coex enabled */
> -				return ret;
> +				/* Bail out anyway when coex disabled. */
> +				return 0;
>  			}
>  
>  			/* Coex enabled, carry on in any case. */
> -- 

Indeed.

Thanks,
Cristian