Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764729AbXH1Teu (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:34:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932571AbXH1TcS (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:32:18 -0400 Received: from filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu ([130.245.126.2]:35937 "EHLO filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932559AbXH1TcP (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:32:15 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:31:26 -0400 From: Josef Sipek To: Christoph Hellwig , Jeff Layton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] add killattr inode operation to allow filesystems to interpret ATTR_KILL_S*ID bits Message-ID: <20070828193125.GA27309@filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> References: <200708271727.l7RHR36m007248@dantu.rdu.redhat.com> <20070828191114.GA3419@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070828191114.GA3419@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-07-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1568 Lines: 39 On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 08:11:14PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Sorry for not replying to the previsious revisions, but I've been out > for on vacation. > > I can't say I like this version. Now we've got callouts at two rather close > levels which is not very nice from the interface POV. > > Maybe preference is for the first scheme where we simply move interpreation > of the ATTR_KILL_SUID/ATTR_KILL_SGID into the setattr routine and provide > a nice helper for the normal filesystem to use. > > If people are really concerned about adding two lines of code to the > handfull of setattr operation there's a variant of this scheme that can > avoid it: It's not about adding 2 lines of code - it's about adding the requirement for the fs to call a function. > - notify_change is modified to not clear the ATTR_KILL_SUID/ATTR_KILL_SGID > but update ia_mode and the ia_valid flag to include ATTR_MODE. > - disk filesystems stay unchanged and never look at > ATTR_KILL_SUID/ATTR_KILL_SGID, but nfs can check for it and ignore > the ATTR_MODE flags and ia_valid in this case and do the right thing > on the server side. Sounds reasonable. Josef 'Jeff' Sipek. -- I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated." - Ken Thompson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/