Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F8BC54E94 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 20:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230510AbjAXURG (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:17:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35598 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230221AbjAXURE (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:17:04 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 207D683EE for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:17:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id j5so2598766pjn.5 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:17:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tnps9xVOfH3PPgr1zmMdnLEIT0DDz3WfUqZSEXwwr/o=; b=PpouaE7EQFpmqsL1Ig1tmZQ2vY/kUcmPs518HqRUfERC1WUr9/VrTyAAqx2b19/IOe jeLrXDTuNSo1K3fPhFzl4ObsptGiZxNHj82Dcp63npD6NRe3sAUdEj+1lLAeuYlQCAUx cdszV8gVi4Cd1dOGzsiwwF1ghOcyqkuJkVpWJ49/BYlbVqqmksdMMJcXno4VLpizhL0c 6h8DZKy4euhH0OexghXa01BXsfj6tGkgSNxS6k2jx3rzmU+JRzUtVoCACWJiSXI4tb8x Ro+bEzJfRx3k7MVWkTqVolNK5Edh8LOoN+l6VU4mSfPWn/qVvDNQwEdVW5MOya5+oQUV AAlw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=tnps9xVOfH3PPgr1zmMdnLEIT0DDz3WfUqZSEXwwr/o=; b=8I+Ixc5aBCTsA53IJzW7J3sm41yxNj8qLzqrW1XTXbqM4Ok83QU16th8/HwChy+rQV r6wSgl1zptJ8K8CqgD70e8a5VG1SNkv/DzbPfSie4N55Vgiqc6hzyuzuh+MaQJyCa9YG /rKgsIYzNkqgjlrerOABi8QaVq/Cz30o3OPvX+05HHN8shsfKnrPwfy1oqD//v+I707B v8E2wLTB8tv73t613DupRP+sfi+3NMSHSUn1SvO9HXaeF838lWnteGLASb6qjd3HTRsU qxp5mmZx/iBbsdDtFai7IQaWhAaqOwVGNaz2A1BpPdMnTMvhMvqd8kmX22HrQMSfhZrr fukQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUsgtGjB20TLcpl5YC0E3ath1WC6hzREj1g6B1yUCipUrgf2/Vg ffmmP/LNAJIC9XAnvvvUTh1x81eIlbfOlB66jEw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9y7Vwacso7iTYoyGLt9NtJsrhqIV/kv0DQvGcm/i9oxewbjuP0k3okxbtp//izfppyEAaZqg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2644:b0:189:b910:c6d2 with SMTP id je4-20020a170903264400b00189b910c6d2mr272488plb.1.1674591423366; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:17:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (7.104.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.104.7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 13-20020a170902c24d00b00192aa53a7d5sm2104936plg.8.2023.01.24.12.17.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:17:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 20:16:59 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Like Xu Cc: Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Rewrite reprogram_counters() to improve performance Message-ID: References: <20221111102645.82001-1-likexu@tencent.com> <20221111102645.82001-4-likexu@tencent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221111102645.82001-4-likexu@tencent.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 11, 2022, Like Xu wrote: > From: Like Xu > > A valid pmc is always tested before using pmu->reprogram_pmi. Eliminate > this part of the redundancy by setting the counter's bitmask directly, > and in addition, trigger KVM_REQ_PMU only once to save more cpu cycles. It's a little silly, but can you split this into two patches? First optimize the helper, then expose it in pmu.h. The optimization stands on its own, whereas the code movement is justified only by the incoming AMD PMU v2 support. > Signed-off-by: Like Xu > --- > arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h | 11 +++++++++++ > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 12 ------------ > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h > index 2b5376ba66ea..be552c8217a0 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h > @@ -189,6 +189,17 @@ static inline void kvm_pmu_request_counter_reprogam(struct kvm_pmc *pmc) > kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_PMU, pmc->vcpu); > } > > +static inline void reprogram_counters(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, u64 diff) > +{ > + int bit; > + > + if (diff) { > + for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&diff, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) > + __set_bit(bit, pmu->reprogram_pmi); > + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_PMU, pmu_to_vcpu(pmu)); > + } > +} > + > void kvm_pmu_deliver_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > void kvm_pmu_handle_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > int kvm_pmu_rdpmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned pmc, u64 *data); > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c > index 2f7cd388859c..db704eea2d7c 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c > @@ -68,18 +68,6 @@ static struct kvm_pmc *intel_pmc_idx_to_pmc(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, int pmc_idx) > } > } > > -static void reprogram_counters(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, u64 diff) > -{ > - int bit; > - struct kvm_pmc *pmc; > - > - for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&diff, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) { > - pmc = intel_pmc_idx_to_pmc(pmu, bit); > - if (pmc) > - kvm_pmu_request_counter_reprogam(pmc); > - } > -} > - > static bool intel_hw_event_available(struct kvm_pmc *pmc) > { > struct kvm_pmu *pmu = pmc_to_pmu(pmc); > -- > 2.38.1 >