From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc:     alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] Docs/sound/index: Add missing SPDX License
 Identifier
In-Reply-To: <268823a3-f453-a38b-3fd7-500306675890@linux.intel.com>
References: <20230122213650.187710-1-sj@kernel.org>
 <20230122213650.187710-9-sj@kernel.org> <875ycxr7qv.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
 <268823a3-f453-a38b-3fd7-500306675890@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:04:45 -0700
Message-ID: <87r0vjfv2a.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> writes:

> On 1/23/23 02:10, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 22:36:50 +0100,
>> SeongJae Park wrote:
>>>
>>> Add missing SPDX License Identifier for sound documentation index file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
>> 
>> Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
>
> Isn't GPL-2.0 deprecated? It should be GPL-2.0-only, no?
>
> https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0.html
>
> https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-only.html

The kernel community hasn't really followed along with that change on
the part of the SPDX folks; as far as I know, GPL-2.0 is considered to
be just fine.  There are currently more than twice as many GPL-2.0
declarations than GPL-2.0-only.

Thanks,

jon