Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07CDC38142 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 01:57:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231482AbjAYB5g (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2023 20:57:36 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44344 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230160AbjAYB5e (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2023 20:57:34 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 059933B0DE for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 17:57:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id rl14so40551960ejb.2 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 17:57:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/mKFyQdCK+sFsQ62/Alg3KP7i9MMdCNwigkeF8QsM/A=; b=moVGq3j7mY9vwiXNvzJqg0s8DHlSR9CmEAz6WBRUWUIqUb/5upUHGzWQ0TdWfmSIUE 1gnpPFhe5NPFqlhU0dgwNuAILQ77w5Ed7YG9OzzRDs7c42mSZGHJWZ/97IboecLqehVs jcQ5EjUe/Z4grGvkQo8xV1UZvNTJfPPoPPJa96NNIzvXNRI2ZVf1HcCuPSoqPvesf8OJ DEULqAsp/JGIYkwD9qurOSdj7iJ3FrrVYvGPsA5mA9kdzGsEIue10/9RsKtNvlhC3z+0 giWN9CyoAPDwhoUzUeNvlgLjF97IiEyWWW8boz+yj3AcC8d7SNRynJmzeehPCUN+YxYM UJEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/mKFyQdCK+sFsQ62/Alg3KP7i9MMdCNwigkeF8QsM/A=; b=24ACvNFYUpTvxULqrERXA9yYCa6IH/hf8kmt7dLoaC1UA02UVwQFkK2z+eKo6Qw4iy 2vxBQDNpdtt2lFAec3GeaA6aLOV3GzBdVF0QM6NtCr2XqyV/tj/gC5Jof8iEaB66hwDw TIDo1Jnu1Sj+lMtNCaJ75+fvTUF0WyVVxFlpogPiVRrHz9EEMIKaalclqhVzrI0YMJzI bJLqXtlyWNxnbXwkCSd0IbWd9mfAeUKnOx9+vlmSIt+fFeICw69iK2JsgcMJ+5FSzG3r a7znJHqkczI4tUNcuEZ/ymtFL4VBsYn3LczdT2hReLIamqMuypPTys4wb/CvSis7nds3 OMiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kr+nGU512OieF0RlB2igJfToaNHIPr43HV6UL9D6caQY+DkJ1DC Ycs40U+oWXOrcHfAS9meUUx6XQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXvvfVLo6uoOWYvx6AfYZxEwfpNt+CFEl9MEZT7I7eIv0P0XG4dhVAgWPJtV9+bKMd/U1gslog== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9548:b0:86f:fe6b:57f7 with SMTP id ex8-20020a170907954800b0086ffe6b57f7mr27293741ejc.62.1674611849499; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 17:57:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (abyl109.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl. [83.9.31.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t9-20020a170906608900b00871cb1b8f63sm1636301ejj.26.2023.01.24.17.57.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Jan 2023 17:57:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7781e371-781c-c301-6504-99fdeb7f2b36@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 02:57:26 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] interconnect: qcom: rpm: Always set QoS params on QNoC Content-Language: en-US To: Bryan O'Donoghue , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org, agross@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org Cc: marijn.suijten@somainline.org, Georgi Djakov , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Loic Poulain , Shawn Guo References: <20230116132152.405535-1-konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> <20230116132152.405535-3-konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> <8673ef49-a37e-2d76-b800-bf9b10875006@linaro.org> From: Konrad Dybcio In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 19.01.2023 01:27, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 18/01/2023 20:36, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> Would be very nice if somebody could test this one in particular >> on QCM2290 to make sure it does not regress that SoC.. >> >> Shawn, Loic? >> >> Konrad > > I have a 2290. > > Since I'm already helping with review, I'm happy to help with test too. Thanks! I'm afraid it won't be necessary though.. This patch gives more trouble than it solves. Here's the thing: It was working perfectly on my SM6375 for quite some time and then I rebased my branch on a newer -next and suddenly it makes things go boom boom.. I think I'll drop it in the next revision, even if that's what downstream does.. At least until I pretend to be an archaeologist surgeon again and debug this.. Konrad > > --- > bod