Date:   Wed, 25 Jan 2023 10:37:06 +0700
From:   Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
To:     "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Xin Li <xin3.li@intel.com>
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        x86 Mailing List <x86@kernel.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        Linux Kselftest Mailing List 
        <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/2] selftests/x86: sysret_rip: Handle syscall in
 a FRED system
Message-ID: <Y9Cj4ta/DpiVGFeo@biznet-home.integral.gnuweeb.org>
References: <6cd0db14-c9e2-3598-fd10-4b473d78c373@citrix.com>
 <5ecc383c-621b-57d9-7f6d-d63496fca3b3@zytor.com>
 <20230124022729.596997-1-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
 <20230124022729.596997-3-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
 <ce25e53f-91d4-d793-42a5-036d6bce0b4c@zytor.com>
 <Y899kHYbz32H1S6a@biznet-home.integral.gnuweeb.org>
 <BC632CA8-D2CB-4781-82E5-9810347293B0@zytor.com>
 <Y8+hGxVpgFVcm15g@biznet-home.integral.gnuweeb.org>
 <20230125032240.728463-1-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
 <20230125032240.728463-2-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230125032240.728463-2-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:22:39AM +0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> +	/*
> +	 * Test that we don't get a mix of REGS_SAVED and REGS_SYSRET.
> +	 * It needs at least calling do_syscall() twice to assert.
> +	 */
> +	if (regs_ok_state == REGS_UNDEFINED) {
> +		/*
> +		 * First time calling do_syscall().
> +		 */
> +		regs_ok_state = ret;
> +		return ret;
> +	} else {

Oops, this should not be returning ret here. Ignore this version.
I'll send v5.

-- 
Ammar Faizi