Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B7EC54E94 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235200AbjAYJQS (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 04:16:18 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39756 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235093AbjAYJQQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 04:16:16 -0500 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C04A43902 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 01:16:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2208D21C63; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:16:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1674638174; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dbEk+ZO9OgIMyfnfk7cAzQznGDfrejCScbCPOkSmu1w=; b=s0ozv1x9WXQ3dVgwQCWBhwhhR42bJ9Y8Oqd/qFRIUy1uRxCPJ/zFFe2F6ok5PV/DytzFeX +zPvwL0KT/BKtOVyx1kLXv6MxTj9LuJM6GPrwIVQJpIYAme1bchNNQmPt0MhL3v1j+XOvS xLeDw1vJ6LXcjbFysIRSIOo9BelbRpU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1674638174; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dbEk+ZO9OgIMyfnfk7cAzQznGDfrejCScbCPOkSmu1w=; b=CguzZdWDaw9vRJhhpHymRwFFEWXULpojH/hqepwNAj+i/bVHxMdTpWkLsFiAwhAqJKLIw6 BwRQDwZWqMXOigBg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07D271339E; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:16:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id qZDYAV7z0GMbFAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 09:16:14 +0000 Received: by quack3.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6879DA06B5; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 10:16:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 10:16:13 +0100 From: Jan Kara To: Shigeru Yoshida Cc: jack@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+aebf90eea2671c43112a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] udf: Fix a race condition between udf_rename() and udf_expand_dir_adinicb() Message-ID: <20230125091613.6pg5ft3lpcwijw6q@quack3> References: <20230124173015.3213309-1-syoshida@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230124173015.3213309-1-syoshida@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 25-01-23 02:30:15, Shigeru Yoshida wrote: > syzbot reported a general fault in udf_filter_write_fi() [1]. This > causes a stack trace like below: > > general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000005: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN > KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000028-0x000000000000002f] > CPU: 0 PID: 5127 Comm: syz-executor298 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc3-next-20230112-syzkaller #0 > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022 > RIP: 0010:udf_fiiter_write_fi+0x14e/0x9d0 fs/udf/directory.c:402 > ... > Call Trace: > > udf_rename+0x69d/0xb80 fs/udf/namei.c:874 > vfs_rename+0x1162/0x1a90 fs/namei.c:4780 > do_renameat2+0xb22/0xc30 fs/namei.c:4931 > __do_sys_rename fs/namei.c:4977 [inline] > __se_sys_rename fs/namei.c:4975 [inline] > __x64_sys_rename+0x81/0xa0 fs/namei.c:4975 > do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] > do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd > > The cause of this issue is a race condition between udf_rename() and > udf_expand_dir_adinicb(). > > If udf_rename() and udf_expand_dir_adinicb() run concurrently, > iinfo->i_alloc_type can be changed by udf_expand_dir_adinicb() while > udf_rename() is running. This causes NULL pointer dereference for > iter->bh[0]->b_data in udf_fiiter_write_fi(). > > Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=2811e6cdd35ea1df1fa2ef31b8d92c6408aa15d2 [1] > Reported-by: syzbot+aebf90eea2671c43112a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida Thanks for the patch but I have already fixed the bug in a patch I've posted here [1]. A cleaner fix is actually to use i_rwsem to protect moved directory from other modifications (which is what I did). [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230124121814.25951-14-jack@suse.cz Honza > --- > fs/udf/namei.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/udf/namei.c b/fs/udf/namei.c > index 06f066ba3072..5048652c6cd4 100644 > --- a/fs/udf/namei.c > +++ b/fs/udf/namei.c > @@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ static struct buffer_head *udf_expand_dir_adinicb(struct inode *inode, > uint8_t *impuse; > int ret; > > + down_write(&iinfo->i_data_sem); > + > if (UDF_QUERY_FLAG(inode->i_sb, UDF_FLAG_USE_SHORT_AD)) > alloctype = ICBTAG_FLAG_AD_SHORT; > else > @@ -157,7 +159,7 @@ static struct buffer_head *udf_expand_dir_adinicb(struct inode *inode, > if (!inode->i_size) { > iinfo->i_alloc_type = alloctype; > mark_inode_dirty(inode); > - return NULL; > + goto out; > } > > /* alloc block, and copy data to it */ > @@ -165,15 +167,15 @@ static struct buffer_head *udf_expand_dir_adinicb(struct inode *inode, > iinfo->i_location.partitionReferenceNum, > iinfo->i_location.logicalBlockNum, err); > if (!(*block)) > - return NULL; > + goto out; > newblock = udf_get_pblock(inode->i_sb, *block, > iinfo->i_location.partitionReferenceNum, > 0); > if (!newblock) > - return NULL; > + goto out; > dbh = udf_tgetblk(inode->i_sb, newblock); > if (!dbh) > - return NULL; > + goto out; > lock_buffer(dbh); > memcpy(dbh->b_data, iinfo->i_data, inode->i_size); > memset(dbh->b_data + inode->i_size, 0, > @@ -197,7 +199,7 @@ static struct buffer_head *udf_expand_dir_adinicb(struct inode *inode, > if (ret < 0) { > *err = ret; > udf_free_blocks(inode->i_sb, inode, &eloc, 0, 1); > - return NULL; > + goto out; > } > mark_inode_dirty(inode); > > @@ -213,6 +215,8 @@ static struct buffer_head *udf_expand_dir_adinicb(struct inode *inode, > impuse = NULL; > udf_fiiter_write_fi(&iter, impuse); > } > + up_write(&iinfo->i_data_sem); > + > /* > * We don't expect the iteration to fail as the directory has been > * already verified to be correct > @@ -221,6 +225,9 @@ static struct buffer_head *udf_expand_dir_adinicb(struct inode *inode, > udf_fiiter_release(&iter); > > return dbh; > +out: > + up_write(&iinfo->i_data_sem); > + return NULL; > } > > static int udf_fiiter_add_entry(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, > @@ -766,6 +773,7 @@ static int udf_rename(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *old_dir, > bool has_diriter = false; > int retval; > struct kernel_lb_addr tloc; > + struct udf_inode_info *old_iinfo = UDF_I(old_inode); > > if (flags & ~RENAME_NOREPLACE) > return -EINVAL; > @@ -780,11 +788,13 @@ static int udf_rename(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *old_dir, > goto out_oiter; > } > > + down_read(&old_iinfo->i_data_sem); > + > if (S_ISDIR(old_inode->i_mode)) { > if (new_inode) { > retval = -ENOTEMPTY; > if (!empty_dir(new_inode)) > - goto out_oiter; > + goto out_unlock; > } > retval = udf_fiiter_find_entry(old_inode, &dotdot_name, > &diriter); > @@ -795,7 +805,7 @@ static int udf_rename(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *old_dir, > retval = -EFSCORRUPTED; > } > if (retval) > - goto out_oiter; > + goto out_unlock; > has_diriter = true; > tloc = lelb_to_cpu(diriter.fi.icb.extLocation); > if (udf_get_lb_pblock(old_inode->i_sb, &tloc, 0) != > @@ -805,25 +815,25 @@ static int udf_rename(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *old_dir, > "directory (ino %lu) has parent entry pointing to another inode (%lu != %u)\n", > old_inode->i_ino, old_dir->i_ino, > udf_get_lb_pblock(old_inode->i_sb, &tloc, 0)); > - goto out_oiter; > + goto out_unlock; > } > } > > retval = udf_fiiter_find_entry(new_dir, &new_dentry->d_name, &niter); > if (retval && retval != -ENOENT) > - goto out_oiter; > + goto out_unlock; > /* Entry found but not passed by VFS? */ > if (!retval && !new_inode) { > retval = -EFSCORRUPTED; > udf_fiiter_release(&niter); > - goto out_oiter; > + goto out_unlock; > } > /* Entry not found? Need to add one... */ > if (retval) { > udf_fiiter_release(&niter); > retval = udf_fiiter_add_entry(new_dir, new_dentry, &niter); > if (retval) > - goto out_oiter; > + goto out_unlock; > } > > /* > @@ -882,7 +892,10 @@ static int udf_rename(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *old_dir, > mark_inode_dirty(new_dir); > } > } > + up_read(&old_iinfo->i_data_sem); > return 0; > +out_unlock: > + up_read(&old_iinfo->i_data_sem); > out_oiter: > if (has_diriter) > udf_fiiter_release(&diriter); > -- > 2.39.0 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR