Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 21:47:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 21:46:54 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:16659 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 21:46:45 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 00:46:23 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Robert Love Cc: Benjamin LaHaise , Anthony DeRobertis , root , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make highly niced processes run only when idle In-Reply-To: <1007944229.878.21.camel@phantasy> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9 Dec 2001, Robert Love wrote: > Hmm, what if we only boosted it based on something like this: > > if (p->policy == SCHED_IDLE) { > weight = p->counter; > if (p->lock_depth >= 0 || signal_pending(p)) > /* boost somehow ... */ > } Now what if the process is holding an inode or superblock semaphore ? Rik -- Shortwave goes a long way: irc.starchat.net #swl http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/