Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932877AbXH2JtV (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:49:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755456AbXH2JtM (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:49:12 -0400 Received: from smtp-103-wednesday.noc.nerim.net ([62.4.17.103]:2071 "EHLO mallaury.nerim.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753473AbXH2JtK (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:49:10 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:49:59 +0200 From: Jean Delvare To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , "Mark M. Hoffman" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, "Yani Ioannou" Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] v1 of IBM power meter driver Message-ID: <20070829114959.5ddb8d79@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20070828162851.GJ32667@tree.beaverton.ibm.com> References: <20070827211446.GG32667@tree.beaverton.ibm.com> <20070828015029.GA10107@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20070828131942.18449886@hyperion.delvare> <20070828162851.GJ32667@tree.beaverton.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.5 (GTK+ 2.10.6; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1526 Lines: 35 Hi Darrick, On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:28:51 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:19:42PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > I see that the driver relies on IPMI. Can't it be merged with the > > out-of-tree impisensors driver then? This would give that driver some > > momentum so that it can finally be merged, and I would like to avoid > > having two drivers if one is enough. Note though that I don't know > > anything about IPMI so I might as well be totally wrong ;) > > The IBM PEx meters are accessible via custom IPMI commands, not the > standard IPMI sensor interface. I considered modifying the ipmisensors > driver, but reached the opinion that it would clutter that driver > unnecessarily, particularly since there are a lot of systems with IPMI > BMCs, but most of them will not have this interface. OK, fine with me then. > That said, what is standing in the way of ipmisensors being merged? I > think I can shake out some free time to apply TLC. I don't know exactly, check out the website for details: http://bmcsensors-26.sourceforge.net/ It needs at least review and testing, but maybe there are a few more steps before merging can be considered. Adding Yani (the author) to Cc, please work with him if you're interested. -- Jean Delvare - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/