Date:   Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:50:15 +0000
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To:     Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
        Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        tangmeng <tangmeng@uniontech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] firmware/psci: Switch to the sys-off handler API
Message-ID: <20230125165015.cpar5hcw53wq5rek@bogus>
References: <20230101181715.42199-1-samuel@sholland.org>
 <20230101181715.42199-3-samuel@sholland.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230101181715.42199-3-samuel@sholland.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jan 01, 2023 at 12:17:15PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> Any other poweroff handlers registered at the default priority will
> run before the legacy pm_power_off() function. Register the PSCI
> poweroff handler with the correct priority to ensure it runs first.
>
> PSCI_0_2_FN_SYSTEM_OFF never returns, so the value returned from
> psci_sys_poweroff() is meaningless, but that function must return
> some value to have the right prototype for a notifier callback.
>

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

--
Regards,
Sudeep