Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52D5C61D9D for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 20:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236442AbjAYUfV (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:35:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35128 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230064AbjAYUfT (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:35:19 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9412A3F298; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 12:35:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44733B819C1; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 20:35:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D60F8C433D2; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 20:35:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1674678916; bh=8U2DugR9MKz12cxFiXKOhg5icyU2FP2WpZ+gq9wbYaA=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=OQH3KGpP8uLcJIeQ6j+iZSMcfDEhvOegromXyLnN+AYR9+IMAXXnDLLYyW79LSYHz 2LR6a8xl8Uevg21g23XOMaa49u8at72bYs8Ox2L+TnH9fdpNeDNoXlA4DTdkVtLvye sBBMlZgYqlMyzN6uxjbrxhJe7Fl+iU3fflfNPruzh1cDGtGhWD8CkcLR7dw6hGXryU nMzvM1wPSWXePgfrknMw/fksQapG+m4oLaFpWsVkb4MRqVfq3RavNAR8ImiPPZyug+ Yp1pS3KFJ8Va2/ouZ06qV/ZmUcZkObTgYruNotw+DibQTcDxRGTpk+sq6Yt3h71Os7 ifLkpMloV5Y/g== Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20230125104520.89684-4-quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> References: <20230125104520.89684-1-quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> <20230125104520.89684-4-quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] clk: qcom: Add STROMER PLUS PLL type for IPQ5332 From: Stephen Boyd Cc: Kathiravan T To: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy , agross@kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org, broonie@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, nfraprado@collabora.com, quic_gurus@quicinc.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, robimarko@gmail.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, will@kernel.org Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 12:35:13 -0800 User-Agent: alot/0.10 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Kathiravan Thirumoorthy (2023-01-25 02:45:13) > From: Kathiravan T >=20 > Add the support for stromer plus pll, which is found on the IPQ5332 > SoCs. Programming sequence is same as the stromer pll, so we can re-use > the same. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T > --- Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd I'm amazed that we need so many different register layouts for PLLs. Was it really never standardized? So sad.