Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15959C61D9D for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 21:56:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230301AbjAYV4w (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:56:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49380 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229940AbjAYVzL (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:55:11 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A50C2696; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 13:55:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id d10so80342ilc.12; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 13:55:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=neYEi0cw4EDxVYjfQLR6pAXtwhYG53KqKTVTIsfdX4k=; b=D8kM3+XfkUVIQZCl0fXu4VUjpGIbecF4+xekcyktbQwE5SmYPqX6iIoh0lvosgKhI3 T+6MdQmw2SGrFsQKEg39zajkJc57jZXd0WnaGUc/P7LlfInKTthVR3hLo506eqNAjxCb sQ+XIm7ppRULHxGcOB050jml5TzGiDn4Wl+psJk/SKeAZSrtXhTm/1G/ik+vD3bhJvmp eWl7cjG5KpBxXCUPe8kA2WjLtNJwI01RXlIEVgxpOPKR95uq1vZpZ+goi7mfbG3pYbSv 1sic8U6OFeUj8RfZwA4VryvKcjn899kQAQhrpGobdWxJpubMEJ/4DeGkJBJ/GFUedyFM q+SA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=neYEi0cw4EDxVYjfQLR6pAXtwhYG53KqKTVTIsfdX4k=; b=Qekhj47MLC/XXweRnMjxOvwi0CgJGYeNkwLDQzXZ9ETSXwTypRNY3iL13LJyiFmh8p 7uuSx3ea4/dVQnunTF0Ff5fIu0/1No2lNrcz01kwjcfj7kGTbX8n/Ntiu7mKXO6h/bj6 JO3vcFU/ikteFofDRhf7m0x1MstBplqIUJl9Zs1/9Yp65vZ/RbOGQS70YuLrhyPxBr3c km7MBP9sZ/Bgl+G7t7ltosUYXDXGwPtg+xGO1MFR4DEvZVggJmoi/TpFDJAfpKajYTDm im9PhoGoQ6xzuVNYqGSs/ISjM0eWNGr9Kge1SavRyQLgO3Y3a4R+TBWv9Xg90Rs9OazM wcKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kruuSdhw3nqQ/EmNAxY4A64tMlQXVaMkF1few9Lj7RtpTN/N47Z /ONbWDftfyWDyOnwUsYJ8y2r3ITT6m/yFMlmO5W5FnaBzG0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXvhV5JG7qD7XXjwA72/JoOIluBtsCYvQQMzrPWbWd7PNpDARPbsll/2FI3hJwy/YTaFzMI19nmpFsD0ZA8Li4s= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:c0d:b0:30f:5797:2c71 with SMTP id d13-20020a056e020c0d00b0030f57972c71mr2157310ile.51.1674683709367; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 13:55:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230125143425.85268-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?B?SsOzIMOBZ2lsYSBCaXRzY2g=?= Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 22:54:58 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] usb: gadget: Use correct APIs and data types for UUID handling To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 9:01 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 06:31:36PM +0100, J=C3=B3 =C3=81gila Bitsch wrote= : > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 3:34 PM Andy Shevchenko > > wrote: > > > > > > We have two types for UUIDs depending on the byte ordering. > > > Instead of explaining how bytes should go over the wire, > > > use dedicated APIs and data types. This removes a confusion > > > over the byte ordering. > > > > Thanks for pointing this out. I was unaware of the exact UUID > > functions, as I'm still quite a newbie here. > > > > I compiled and tested your patch in my test setup and it works perfectl= y. > > Thanks for the testing. According to Submitting Patches documentation > you can provide a formal Tested-by tag. Thanks for pointing this out to me. I'm not really sure how to do that though. On https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#reviewer-s-state= ment-of-oversight, it says: > Both Tested-by and Reviewed-by tags, once received on mailing list from t= ester or reviewer, should be added by author to the applicable patches when= sending next versions. So I guess you could do that at your convenience on any next version. Or is it already ok, if I just add the following line in my comment? Tested-By: J=C3=B3 =C3=81gila Bitsch I'm still quite a newbie in the kernel development community, so thanks for bearing with my ignorance :-) Best regards and thanks a lot, J=C3=B3 > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >