Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932768AbXH2QF1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:05:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754634AbXH2QFS (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:05:18 -0400 Received: from extu-mxob-2.symantec.com ([216.10.194.135]:41284 "EHLO extu-mxob-2.symantec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754107AbXH2QFR (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:05:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:04:26 +0100 (BST) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@blonde.wat.veritas.com To: Oliver Neukum cc: Arjan van de Ven , Daniel Drake , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: speeding up swapoff In-Reply-To: <200708291636.48323.oliver@neukum.org> Message-ID: References: <1188394172.22156.67.camel@localhost> <20070829073040.1ec35176@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <200708291636.48323.oliver@neukum.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 919 Lines: 22 On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Mittwoch 29 August 2007 schrieb Arjan van de Ven: > > Another question, if this is during system shutdown, maybe that's a > > valid case for flushing most of the pagecache first (from userspace) > > since most of what's there won't be used again anyway. If that's enough > > to make this go faster... > > Is there a good reason to swapoff during shutdown? Three reasons, I think, only one of them compelling: 1. Tidiness. 2. So swapoff gets testing and I get to hear of any bugs in it. 3. If a regular swapfile is used instead of a disk partition, you need to swapoff before its filesystem can be unmounted cleanly. Hugh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/