Message-ID: <febd59ed-ff7b-ffc4-5568-d856703c9123@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:31:55 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.7.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: qcom: restrict drivers per ARM/ARM64
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230123094925.54824-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
 <20230123094925.54824-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
 <7ddf5c74de84c5dc291996423cb1eb46.sboyd@kernel.org>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <7ddf5c74de84c5dc291996423cb1eb46.sboyd@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 25/01/2023 21:44, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2023-01-23 01:49:25)
>> There is no point to allow selecting pin-controller drivers for Qualcomm
> 
> pin controllers?

Copy-paste, I'll fix it.

> 
>> ARMv7 SoCs when building ARM64 kernel, and vice versa.  This makes
>> kernel configuration more difficult as many do not remember the Qualcomm
>> SoCs model names/numbers.  There won't be a single image for ARMv7 and
>> ARMv8/9 SoCs, so no features/options are lost.
> 
> Are the drivers used in arm32 emulation mode on these SoCs? I recall
> there are some SoCs they run with the arm architecture.

I did not add it to the few SoCs which have upstream DTS in ARM and
ARM64. I added only to the ones which are in one specific folder. Also
my patch does not affect defconfigs (qcom_defconfig and arm64/defconfig).

Whether downstream could be affected, I do not know. Anyway, what's
downstream it's the downstream's problem...


Best regards,
Krzysztof