From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
To:     matthias.bgg@gmail.com
Cc:     robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
        seiya.wang@mediatek.com, tinghan.shen@mediatek.com,
        allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] Fix MT8186/92/95 topology and idle state names
Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2023 11:35:20 +0100
Message-Id: <20230126103526.417039-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

MT8186, MT8192 and MT8195 use ARM DynamIQ, which combines big and
LITTLE cores in one single cluster! A two cluster topology is simply
wrong in this case.

While at it, after some research, I've also noticed that the names
assigned to the idle states are misleading, so I went on changing
them to reflect the actual function.

The names change commits, unlike the CPU map ones, didn't get any
Fixes tag, as naming changes aren't fixing anything that would be
meaningful for functionality (it's cosmetic, nothing else).

AngeloGioacchino Del Regno (6):
  arm64: dts: mt8195: Fix CPU map for single-cluster SoC
  arm64: dts: mt8192: Fix CPU map for single-cluster SoC
  arm64: dts: mt8186: Fix CPU map for single-cluster SoC
  arm64: dts: mt8195: Change idle states names to reflect actual
    function
  arm64: dts: mt8186: Change idle states names to reflect actual
    function
  arm64: dts: mt8192: Change idle states names to reflect actual
    function

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi | 30 ++++++++++----------
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi | 35 +++++++++++-------------
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi | 34 +++++++++++------------
 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

-- 
2.39.0