Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01193C61DA3 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232560AbjAZPY0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:24:26 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60310 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232501AbjAZPYK (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:24:10 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AE2B420C; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 07:23:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30QFEiR3004356; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:23:48 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : to : cc : references : from : subject : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=38Q/0OCGry8peDMSSdqlhdz0+1fJJuYxwowWJYS44go=; b=f0JWtdmKNHHIZwUwiDGJM69eVPs8Y5AjYb3g3BqL94aw5tg1LbDgjTxK9NpBqs5omPfD TWWDJN7GOgxjXPd1iahdemLwBRJahCVwLZpzaU+tTSETaHm9kGOuj7qtBC5QfjlupSCI 3CQjRLWGZ+yD8GxOW+U/2yUeCF8B3XxP0e7wGSYai1vlceE17tdWqDKO0lTlRelg9eKd RVpK/DeNGlqzUrO3YFqB64vrsaciUfCtzTM4gteJtftdeSydjnV3Ni88FPpjCqWDYJeR rwl/e6DDkP91ra6Whr/eTN0A/3hxSO72Vdz6slnBwqvMzcNGk4OVUavZo3ZRGogjc5fE EA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3nbv06g5rr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:23:48 +0000 Received: from m0098399.ppops.net (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 30QFEqEK004557; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:23:47 GMT Received: from ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (6a.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.106]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3nbv06g5qw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:23:47 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 30Q2KLlU027371; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:23:45 GMT Received: from smtprelay03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.224]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3n87p6cpay-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:23:45 +0000 Received: from smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.100]) by smtprelay03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 30QFNeUG44827002 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:23:40 GMT Received: from smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A228E2004D; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:23:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668CA20043; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:23:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.152.224.253] (unknown [9.152.224.253]) by smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:23:40 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <2a21195b-9a13-a332-bab9-e2c023fc37a6@linux.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:23:40 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch , Christian Borntraeger , Claudio Imbrenda , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev Cc: David Hildenbrand , Jonathan Corbet , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Shuah Khan , Sven Schnelle , Nico Boehr References: <20230125212608.1860251-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com> <20230125212608.1860251-5-scgl@linux.ibm.com> From: Janosch Frank Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/14] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Add bad address test In-Reply-To: <20230125212608.1860251-5-scgl@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: S7x_h8djFowqJrL1JZ7Fwk9QiDnFy7Pd X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: RdPz5P2-f5xBlgJ2o1DLR7EfVdsF4d4e X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.930,Hydra:6.0.562,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2023-01-26_07,2023-01-25_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2301260146 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/25/23 22:25, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote: > Add test that tries to access, instead of CHECK_ONLY. "" Add a test that tries a real write to a bad address. A CHECK_ONLY test doesn't cover all paths. "" At first I thought you were replacing a test. > > Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch > Reviewed-by: Nico Boehr > --- > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c > index bbc191a13760..5aae27549437 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c > @@ -641,7 +641,9 @@ static void _test_errors_common(struct test_info info, enum mop_target target, i > > /* Bad guest address: */ > rv = ERR_MOP(info, target, WRITE, mem1, size, GADDR((void *)~0xfffUL), CHECK_ONLY); > - TEST_ASSERT(rv > 0, "ioctl does not report bad guest memory access"); > + TEST_ASSERT(rv > 0, "ioctl does not report bad guest memory address"); "ioctl does not report bad guest memory address on CHECK_ONLY write" ? > + rv = ERR_MOP(info, target, WRITE, mem1, size, GADDR((void *)~0xfffUL)); > + TEST_ASSERT(rv > 0, "ioctl does not report bad guest memory address"); "ioctl does not report bad guest memory address on write" ? Not really necessary in this case, it just needs to be different from the one on top. > > /* Bad host address: */ > rv = ERR_MOP(info, target, WRITE, 0, size, GADDR_V(mem1));