From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc:     Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2, RESEND 1/7] x86/tdx: Fix typo in comment in __tdx_hypercall()
Date:   Fri, 27 Jan 2023 01:11:53 +0300
Message-Id: <20230126221159.8635-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230126221159.8635-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
References: <20230126221159.8635-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Comment in __tdx_hypercall() points that RAX==0 indicates TDVMCALL
failure which is opposite of the truth: RAX==0 is success.

Fix the comment. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S
index f9eb1134f22d..74b108e94a0d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S
+++ b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__tdx_hypercall)
 	tdcall
 
 	/*
-	 * RAX==0 indicates a failure of the TDVMCALL mechanism itself and that
+	 * RAX!=0 indicates a failure of the TDVMCALL mechanism itself and that
 	 * something has gone horribly wrong with the TDX module.
 	 *
 	 * The return status of the hypercall operation is in a separate
-- 
2.39.1