Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762175AbXH3Bvq (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:51:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756274AbXH3Bvi (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:51:38 -0400 Received: from max.aladin.ro ([80.96.155.2]:56946 "EHLO aladin.ro" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756046AbXH3Bvh (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:51:37 -0400 Message-ID: <46D622A5.2000205@aladin.ro> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:51:33 +0300 From: Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Forced unmounting for removable devices Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1610 Lines: 30 *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(r) Pro* This might have been discussed a few years ago, but things have changed. I'm talking about patches like this one (I'm not the author): http://developer.osdl.org/dev/fumount/#kernel1 The current situation requires a way to forcibly unmount removable media. Consider the following (real) scenario. Someone has a box with hald + dbus + ivman to support "supermounting" the CDROM drive. He has to install a 2 CD application using Wine for example, but the setup application prevents normal unmounting of the first one. Then he goes on and pushes the button to eject the CD, lazy-unmounting the media. The kernel goes mad and all attempts to load the second CD fail (the kernel hasn't got rid of the first fs). If there was anything like a real forced unmounting, things would have worked well, as on MS Windows itself. As far as I can see, there is no other sane way to solve such problems. So, what's keeping such patches from making their way into the mainstream kernel? All (but maybe I haven't searched enough) arguments against such a feature that I've seen by now just say "it's not needed", "it's not worth it" and so on, and many of them refer to network mounts. P.S.: I'm not saying lazy unmounting should be replaced. They both make sense, depending on the scenario. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/