Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756097AbXH3DKG (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:10:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753073AbXH3DJ4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:09:56 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.187]:23757 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752762AbXH3DJz (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:09:55 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; b=Vw4V3RjREnI4Ob2nKUohzA4mKH6P0GIwymf4lawI5FyrPwGZgUzQRPgz/ZoOHuglYOTGv3jPAUmO1SZU475cRFGCvK7xsLvpn6FcREYHfsJQiDGgvCilClfcjh3IT9bTzGK+G7MQW9w6JkXJSl1XSqW8Mrv0gONzYlrlHDn6heE= From: "Hua Zhong" To: "'Ian Kent'" Cc: "'Linux Kernel Mailing List'" , , "'Adrian Bunk'" References: <00f401c7ea7f$6db9fc80$492df580$@com> <20070829224754.GW26410@stusta.de> <1188442804.4090.10.camel@raven.themaw.net> In-Reply-To: <1188442804.4090.10.camel@raven.themaw.net> Subject: RE: regression of autofs for current git? Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:09:36 -0700 Message-ID: <010401c7eab3$38d16100$aa742300$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcfqseJK+5ALv7R3StOP78+N7nT+NAAAM4cA Content-Language: en-us Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1960 Lines: 65 I am in the process of bisecting now. It takes a while but the bad commit is between 2.6.22 and 13f9966b3ba5b45f47f2ea0eb0a90afceedfbb1f (June 28). I'll continue tomorrow. My system is FC4. autofs-4.1.4-26 nfs-utils-1.0.7-13.FC4 By the way, the particular autofs commit Andrian sent is innocent. It's something else. It will still take me about 10 reboots to bisect. If anyone has a patch for me to try, I'll give it a shot tomorrow. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Kent [mailto:raven@themaw.net] > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:00 PM > To: Hua Zhong > Cc: 'Linux Kernel Mailing List'; autofs@linux.kernel.org; Adrian Bunk > Subject: Re: regression of autofs for current git? > > On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 00:47 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 01:58:58PM -0700, Hua Zhong wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > Hi Hua, > > > > > I am wondering if this is a known issue, but I just built the > current git > > > and several autofs mounts mysteriously disappeared. Restarting > autofs could > > > fix some, but then lose others. 2.6.22 was fine. > > > > > > Is there anything I could check other than bisect? (It may take > some time > > > for me to get to it) > > > > the commit below is the only autofs4 patch that went into the git > tree > > since 2.6.22. > > > > Does reverting it fix your problems? > > Maybe but there is an NFS change that appears to be in the current > 2.6.23-rc kernel and doesn't seem to be in 2.6.22 that is known to > break > some autofs maps and also breaks amd. > > I can't seem to locate the commit just now. > In the meantime what version of user space autofs and nfs-utils are you > running? > And can you post your autofs maps please? > > Ian > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/