Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758804AbXH3D0c (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:26:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757572AbXH3D0T (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:26:19 -0400 Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:39405 "EHLO out2.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757549AbXH3D0G (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:26:06 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: 6i6rKP7HBCR5KDQXzsJGSdPgCWZhJ58pp13B7T7Iu4z3 1188444363 Subject: RE: regression of autofs for current git? From: Ian Kent To: Hua Zhong Cc: "'Linux Kernel Mailing List'" , autofs@linux.kernel.org, "'Adrian Bunk'" In-Reply-To: <010401c7eab3$38d16100$aa742300$@com> References: <00f401c7ea7f$6db9fc80$492df580$@com> <20070829224754.GW26410@stusta.de> <1188442804.4090.10.camel@raven.themaw.net> <010401c7eab3$38d16100$aa742300$@com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:25:58 +0800 Message-Id: <1188444358.4090.15.camel@raven.themaw.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-2.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2479 Lines: 75 On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 20:09 -0700, Hua Zhong wrote: > I am in the process of bisecting now. It takes a while but the bad commit is > between 2.6.22 and 13f9966b3ba5b45f47f2ea0eb0a90afceedfbb1f (June 28). I'll > continue tomorrow. > > My system is FC4. > > autofs-4.1.4-26 > nfs-utils-1.0.7-13.FC4 > > By the way, the particular autofs commit Andrian sent is innocent. It's > something else. > > It will still take me about 10 reboots to bisect. If anyone has a patch for > me to try, I'll give it a shot tomorrow. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=75180df2ed467866ada839fe73cf7cc7d75c0a22 This (and it's related patches) may be the problem. I can probably tell if you post your map or if you strace the automount process managing the a problem mount point and look for mount returning EBUSY when it should succeed. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ian Kent [mailto:raven@themaw.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:00 PM > > To: Hua Zhong > > Cc: 'Linux Kernel Mailing List'; autofs@linux.kernel.org; Adrian Bunk > > Subject: Re: regression of autofs for current git? > > > > On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 00:47 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 01:58:58PM -0700, Hua Zhong wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Hi Hua, > > > > > > > I am wondering if this is a known issue, but I just built the > > current git > > > > and several autofs mounts mysteriously disappeared. Restarting > > autofs could > > > > fix some, but then lose others. 2.6.22 was fine. > > > > > > > > Is there anything I could check other than bisect? (It may take > > some time > > > > for me to get to it) > > > > > > the commit below is the only autofs4 patch that went into the git > > tree > > > since 2.6.22. > > > > > > Does reverting it fix your problems? > > > > Maybe but there is an NFS change that appears to be in the current > > 2.6.23-rc kernel and doesn't seem to be in 2.6.22 that is known to > > break > > some autofs maps and also breaks amd. > > > > I can't seem to locate the commit just now. > > In the meantime what version of user space autofs and nfs-utils are you > > running? > > And can you post your autofs maps please? > > > > Ian > > > > > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/