Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752778AbXH3Ebs (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:31:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752041AbXH3Ebj (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:31:39 -0400 Received: from [212.12.190.141] ([212.12.190.141]:32967 "EHLO raad.intranet" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752336AbXH3Ebi (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:31:38 -0400 From: Al Boldi To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Override 80-wire cable detection for Toshiba S1800-814 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:31:20 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: dex@dragonslave.de MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708300731.20336.a1426z@gawab.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 913 Lines: 26 Alan Cox wrote: > Daniel Exner wrote: >> Attached patch will add above mentioned Laptop Model to whitelist for both >> pata_ali and alim15x3, as it is correctly detected as 40-wire connected >> but this cable is short enough to still do transfers higher than UDMA33. > > Looks good to me - does need a Signed-off-by: line however Wow! I have been running 80wire cable detection override on 40wire cables for quite some time without any problem, but I never thought it to be legal if the 40wire cable length is short enough. How short does it have to be, and can't we have a kernel bootparm to override the cable detection? Thanks! -- Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/