Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758196AbXH3Ih0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:37:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755539AbXH3IhR (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:37:17 -0400 Received: from mx0.karneval.cz ([81.27.192.123]:5039 "EHLO av1.karneval.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755528AbXH3IhQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:37:16 -0400 Message-ID: <46D681B4.90401@stud.feec.vutbr.cz> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:37:08 +0200 From: Michal Schmidt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vitaly Mayatskikh CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] Return available first timeslice to the creator, not parent References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 777 Lines: 22 Vitaly Mayatskikh skrev: > Short-living process returns its timeslice to the parent, this > affects process that creates a lot of such short-living threads, > because its not a parent for new threads. I don't see the point of sending patches for old Linux versions such as 2.6.21, unless it's something applicable to the -stable tree. Do recent kernels with CFS have the same problem? > Patch fixes this issue and > doesn't break kabi as does the patch from reporter: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/7/21 There's no kabi. Michal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/