Message-ID: <d03c3234-42e0-4357-2187-19ff9c7209a0@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jan 2023 13:27:18 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.7.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: realtek: align UART node name with bindings
Content-Language: en-US
To:     =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
Cc:     linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
References: <20230123151514.369101-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
 <167481277324.62929.7688485206150758782.b4-ty@linaro.org>
 <a3ca0bd8-2153-cf69-adf3-bc92a31d0efb@suse.de>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <a3ca0bd8-2153-cf69-adf3-bc92a31d0efb@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 27/01/2023 13:22, Andreas Färber wrote:
> On 27.01.23 10:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:15:14 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Bindings expect UART/serial node names to be "serial".
>>
>> Applied, thanks!
>>
>> Let me know if anyone preferred to take it via sub-arch/SoC maintainer tree.
>> I'll drop it then.
> 
> We did have an equivalent patch in '21, from Zhen Lei of Huawei, that I 
> gave a Reviewed-by for. So should you maybe apply that original patch 
> instead?

I don't have it in my inbox... but if you reviewed it, why didn't pick
it up? Or whoever is/was the maintainer? I personally do not care about
Realtek but I do care about bindings checks to succeed without warnings.

Best regards,
Krzysztof