Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759552AbXH3LR5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:17:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755670AbXH3LRt (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:17:49 -0400 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:60032 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755560AbXH3LRs (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:17:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 05:17:47 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox To: andre@finow14.de Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [KJ][patch 3/3] VIDC20: use abs() from kernel.h instead of own definition Message-ID: <20070830111746.GS14130@parisc-linux.org> References: <20070830102551.131398783@finow14.de> <20070830104038.GD14925@ahaupt-debian-vm.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070830104038.GD14925@ahaupt-debian-vm.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 803 Lines: 19 On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:40:38PM +0200, andre@finow14.de wrote: > - diff_int = my_abs(rate_ext-rate); > - diff_ext = my_abs(rate_int-rate); > + diff_int = abs(rate_ext-rate); > + diff_ext = abs(rate_int-rate); Nothing to do with the patch, but is this really correct? Surely it should be diff_ext = abs(rate_ext-rate) ? -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/