Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E455C38142 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233928AbjA0Ouq (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 09:50:46 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58262 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231710AbjA0Ouk (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 09:50:40 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EDBC449D; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 06:50:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1674831039; x=1706367039; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=JuwPbT8+dmegb/xN4G0cZQNbiBljZvTVwrqhKevCoq8=; b=BzKks688lGIepGc3EaBaKRbDVjVu7pHCSWbp1R9+3wF9sKHIwq1U4FV8 euLoFg8Bjx373q1RjFjMwwwpHzocbeIQ4AD7qdNDcLqIvlDr7E9vgYNTw JeWYKvgk2TaIOSTLsti8zdd7s39FqHlj6jsOdhR2JAbtyL6jrgaTujdTB 4bWv29n4MqjokDeeP7Xw2Dct96rrNA9ctsu5fL3WYmf0DVC8F78XJxLBW f41o25Bt09m9dDTKF983oJLQxaI3kJVfZqucY/UVx3ZnRjL7ajJ9btWRR R5oy7tFKuX4ZQZuYCTThS39mzkU0Y7cfit0cw2S+xwldE9ve5lGhkqoDP g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10603"; a="315052611" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,251,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="315052611" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Jan 2023 06:50:38 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10603"; a="693740944" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,251,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="693740944" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Jan 2023 06:50:36 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pLQ3m-00G0Zg-36; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:50:34 +0200 Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:50:34 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nathan Chancellor , Nicolas Schier , Nick Desaulniers Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] kbuild: make W=1 warn files that are tracked but ignored by git Message-ID: References: <20221229074310.906556-1-masahiroy@kernel.org> <20221229074310.906556-2-masahiroy@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 04:41:37PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:31:07PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 10:25 PM Andy Shevchenko > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 04:43:10PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > > The top .gitignore comments about how to detect files breaking > > > > .gitignore rules, but people rarely care about it. > > > > > > > > Add a new W=1 warning to detect files that are tracked but ignored by > > > > git. If git is not installed or the source tree is not tracked by git > > > > at all, this script does not print anything. > > > > > > > > Running it on v6.2-rc1 detected the following: > > > > > > Since patch was published there is no sign it was ever meet Linux Next. > > > What's the plan? > > > > Oh? > > Sorry, my mistake. I need to understand why these patches do not fix > the issue I have. OK, after carefully reading the commit message it's actually the culprit of the warnings I have. So, it seems we need to wait maintainers / developers of the respective code to go and fix this. Is it your intention? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko