Message-ID: <df6c1cd6-ea70-e65c-b4e8-3da80697242f@quicinc.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jan 2023 21:37:42 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.4.2
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] regulator: qcom_smd: Add support to define the bootup
 voltage
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>, <agross@kernel.org>,
        <andersson@kernel.org>, <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        <broonie@kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     <quic_srichara@quicinc.com>, <quic_gokulsri@quicinc.com>,
        <quic_sjaganat@quicinc.com>, <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com>,
        <quic_arajkuma@quicinc.com>, <quic_anusha@quicinc.com>,
        <quic_poovendh@quicinc.com>, <quic_ipkumar@quicinc.com>
References: <20230113150310.29709-1-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com>
 <20230113150310.29709-7-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com>
 <77d84408-166e-8a02-227a-67654a4d31f2@linaro.org>
From:   Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <77d84408-166e-8a02-227a-67654a4d31f2@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 1/13/2023 9:07 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 13.01.2023 16:03, devi priya wrote:
>> Kernel does not know the initial voltage set by the bootloaders.
>> During regulator registration, the voltage variable is just declared
>> and it is zero. Based on that, the regulator framework considers current
>> the voltage as zero and tries to bring up each regulator to minimum
>> the supported voltage.
>>
>> This introduces a dip in the voltage during kernel boot and gets
>> stabilized once the voltage scaling comes into picture.
>>
>> To avoid the voltage dip, adding support to define the
>> bootup voltage set by the boodloaders and based on it, regulator
>> framework understands that proper voltage is already set
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: devi priya <quic_devipriy@quicinc.com>
>> ---
> Or maybe hook it up to the spmi_regulator_common_get_voltage()
> from the SPMI regulator driver and read the real voltage instead
> of relying on hardcoded values thay may differ between boards?
> 
> Konrad
In IPQ9574, SPMI regulator is not used. We are using RPM-Glink 
communication and the regulators are controlled by RPM.
In this case, we don't have an option to readback the bootup voltage and 
so, we have hardcoded the values

>>   drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c | 6 +++++-
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
>> index 1eb17d378897..49a36b07397c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
>> @@ -800,6 +800,7 @@ struct rpm_regulator_data {
>>   	u32 id;
>>   	const struct regulator_desc *desc;
>>   	const char *supply;
>> +	int boot_uV; /* To store the bootup voltage set by bootloaders */
>>   };
>>   
>>   static const struct rpm_regulator_data rpm_mp5496_regulators[] = {
>> @@ -809,7 +810,7 @@ static const struct rpm_regulator_data rpm_mp5496_regulators[] = {
>>   };
>>   
>>   static const struct rpm_regulator_data rpm_ipq9574_mp5496_regulators[] = {
>> -	{ "s1", QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA, 1, &ipq9574_mp5496_smpa1, "s1" },
>> +	{ "s1", QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA, 1, &ipq9574_mp5496_smpa1, "s1", 875000 },
>>   	{}
>>   };
>>   
>> @@ -1394,6 +1395,9 @@ static int rpm_regulator_init_vreg(struct qcom_rpm_reg *vreg, struct device *dev
>>   	vreg->type	= rpm_data->type;
>>   	vreg->id	= rpm_data->id;
>>   
>> +	if (rpm_data->boot_uV)
>> +		vreg->uV = rpm_data->boot_uV;
>> +
>>   	memcpy(&vreg->desc, rpm_data->desc, sizeof(vreg->desc));
>>   	vreg->desc.name = rpm_data->name;
>>   	vreg->desc.supply_name = rpm_data->supply;
Best Regards,
Devi Priya