Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D62EC54EAA for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:55:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234088AbjA0Qy6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 11:54:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49698 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233870AbjA0Qyt (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 11:54:49 -0500 Received: from mail-oa1-x29.google.com (mail-oa1-x29.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::29]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58BD31ADE5; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:54:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oa1-x29.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-15085b8a2f7so7234972fac.2; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:54:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AKfy4Zb92p4ujrI1Uo6sjErmbYq3MKPY1OiO3UmQ6Ek=; b=FB1DAwfu6rLlMeTEKpjv2E3dXr71osBms5COqFglrcTbeJScC0WUWpdCwAKBmoVoi9 dVPli64tgWV2Vxnrm1fGDjPE4aitqZuMpHk+3SS/XrncbQEqbCfDDfSV8CObNNmidE5u 37f3SXEMpA3eT4mRkP8HBjZmvcdLsFTKSSb6Y504p9HeKxfUJZm2VuDKNH1n+D3bY03/ HkSdbee+0EasDd0sFPUZ9reHn9H7nz893lj4a20odx+v8uy4Q+QvlAksgke/hky+v6Fj SASGNzNBD66/fX/Q0LquVtyVDskxW190JJZgoqJxXKhg37Cr/S0tPsOBLIFVc3V00WYa cA4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AKfy4Zb92p4ujrI1Uo6sjErmbYq3MKPY1OiO3UmQ6Ek=; b=Bsv7Gpypx7PSu8ThBYI+xfaAnguYHVR1geWcSLsQh4o78WviXDPyU6vgSk1zP8U4UV gXqUbuIfaaexYjvo/sM1vEqdNKco/18d9XO6u6V3o5OxH/c5F5PdErEgu2swTYO3/5ka rtjQNL90bL/tv1eRw9q2Nrs0PREkgauTZnsssrjuSDfIds9s/7CIr/IzLtVgS1n3NVgJ Oj1XiGcFhnch0rTEbBuPa1sbI/dOY3qyaxzrVHEtR+QWy47aPdITYLikF8MuQfyoZLCV LoYGywLZIeeJ1zDjmzhafCQHja6lJTMn4H5u444oeVK5X65RSc9RtqDvM9mTFhj3Ku3l BZYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krkYYKlO3l01Q3wp4/b/g0pIG0eCKbPHonGI9nPrd2fq0raGSOj hvR1Uii1KiQHlET4+21FF/M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXuopfL1mgXnujtk5CYG2EnTl+QLAfpTQB4oPXBtlqTlN/VaST/HHopMmyj57+HZNrKhTrrsSg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:4151:b0:15e:cd63:b7b6 with SMTP id r17-20020a056870415100b0015ecd63b7b6mr23335086oad.24.1674838477504; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:54:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e10-20020a056870c34a00b0013b9ee734dcsm2034931oak.35.2023.01.27.08.54.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:54:36 -0800 (PST) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:54:34 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review Message-ID: <20230127165434.GA3962737@roeck-us.net> References: <20230122150219.557984692@linuxfoundation.org> <20230124024734.GB1495310@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 09:59:44AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 06:47:34PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 04:03:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.271 release. > > > There are 37 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:02:08 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > Build results: > > total: 155 pass: 154 fail: 1 > > Failed builds: > > i386:tools/perf > > Qemu test results: > > total: 426 pass: 426 fail: 0 > > > > perf build failure: > > > > util/env.c: In function ‘perf_env__arch’: > > cc1: error: function may return address of local variable [-Werror=return-local-addr] > > util/env.c:166:17: note: declared here > > 166 | struct utsname uts; > > | ^~~ > > > > No one to blame but me, for switching the gcc version used to build perf > > to gcc 10.3.0 (from 9.4.0). The problem is fixed in the upstream kernel > > with commit ebcb9464a2ae3 ("perf env: Do not return pointers to local > > variables"). This patch applies to v5.4.y and earlier kernels. > > It's already in the 5.4.y tree (in release 5.4.56), and it applies to > 4.19.y so I'll add it there, but it does not apply to 4.14.y so I would > need a working backport for that tree if you want it there. Turns out it won't help. It just uncovers other build failures with gcc-10 on v4.19.y, and it looks like the problem was actually introduced between v4.14 and v4.19. I reverted to building perf with gcc-9. Guenter