MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1674682056.git.rgb@redhat.com> <da695bf4-bd9b-a03d-3fbc-686724a7b602@kernel.dk>
 <CAHC9VhSRbay5bEUMJngpj+6Ss=WLeRoyJaNNMip+TyTkTJ6=Lg@mail.gmail.com>
 <24fbe6cb-ee80-f726-b260-09f394ead764@kernel.dk> <CAHC9VhRuvV9vjhmTM4eGJkWmpZmSkgVaoQ=L6g3cahej-F52tQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <d9da8035-ed81-fb28-bf3a-f98c8a1e044a@kernel.dk>
In-Reply-To: <d9da8035-ed81-fb28-bf3a-f98c8a1e044a@kernel.dk>
From:   Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jan 2023 17:53:24 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhRpu7WZDqWKcLDj18A0Z5FJdUU=eUL3wbJH1CnEBWB4GA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] two suggested iouring op audit updates
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc:     Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
        Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@redhat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
        Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
        Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>, Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 5:46 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> On 1/27/23 3:38=E2=80=AFPM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 2:43 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> >> On 1/27/23 12:42=E2=80=AFPM, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> >>>> On 1/27/23 10:23=E2=80=AFAM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> >>>>> A couple of updates to the iouring ops audit bypass selections sugg=
ested in
> >>>>> consultation with Steve Grubb.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Richard Guy Briggs (2):
> >>>>>   io_uring,audit: audit IORING_OP_FADVISE but not IORING_OP_MADVISE
> >>>>>   io_uring,audit: do not log IORING_OP_*GETXATTR
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  io_uring/opdef.c | 4 +++-
> >>>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Look fine to me - we should probably add stable to both of them, jus=
t
> >>>> to keep things consistent across releases. I can queue them up for 6=
.3.
> >>>
> >>> Please hold off until I've had a chance to look them over ...
> >>
> >> I haven't taken anything yet, for things like this I always let it
> >> simmer until people have had a chance to do so.
> >
> > Thanks.  FWIW, that sounds very reasonable to me, but I've seen lots
> > of different behaviors across subsystems and wanted to make sure we
> > were on the same page.
>
> Sounds fair. BTW, can we stop CC'ing closed lists on patch
> submissions? Getting these:
>
> Your message to Linux-audit awaits moderator approval
>
> on every reply is really annoying.

We kinda need audit related stuff on the linux-audit list, that's our
mailing list for audit stuff.

However, I agree that it is crap that the linux-audit list is
moderated, but unfortunately that isn't something I control (I haven't
worked for RH in years, and even then the list owner was really weird
about managing the list).  Occasionally I grumble about moving the
kernel audit development to a linux-audit list on vger but haven't
bothered yet, perhaps this is as good a reason as any.

Richard, Steve - any chance of opening the linux-audit list?

--=20
paul-moore.com