Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760315AbXH3Py0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:54:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753982AbXH3PyT (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:54:19 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:47840 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757366AbXH3PyS (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:54:18 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Bill Davidsen Subject: Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:54:32 -0400 Message-ID: <46D6E838.3020502@tmr.com> References: <46CDE94A.7000600@googlemail.com> <1187904169.2435.83.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com> <46D21E8E.4000003@googlemail.com> <20070827005131.b93f5935.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <6bffcb0e0708270438j4c92a0b4m1396b4010f25bfb5@mail.gmail.com> <1188227585.2435.192.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com> <6bffcb0e0708270826p7a7fb044re53d0db4094bc3d5@mail.gmail.com> <1188229197.2435.207.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com> <72dbd3150708271212w6bcca4c4web26d7cb25892afc@mail.gmail.com> <32209efe0708290042g362fbfadj38fe57e0de7f3af@mail.gmail.com> <20070829222344.GV26410@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org Cc: Natalie Protasevich , David Rees , Daniel Walker , Michal Piotrowski , Andrew Morton , =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFN0ZWluYnJp?= =?UTF-8?B?bms=?= , eranian@hpl.hp.com, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-70-109-100-63.alb.east.verizon.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061105 SeaMonkey/1.0.6 In-Reply-To: <20070829222344.GV26410@stusta.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1377 Lines: 29 Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 12:42:02AM -0700, Natalie Protasevich wrote: >> ... >> Then I think bugzilla needs: >> adding more categories such as security, > > "security" would be a flag like "regression", not a category. > >> system calls (lots of >> implementation suggestions for posix and non-posix ones), >> ... > > Bugzilla is for tracking bugs, not for discussing possible > kernel features. > > Tracking feature or implementation suggestions wouldn't make sense. > Consider e.g. that there are several people on linux-kernel who often > write what they think the kernel should do but who never write a single > line of code themselves. There's no value in tracking such stuff. > That's an interesting viewpoint, only programmers have useful thoughts... ignoring users, people who have CS degrees but don't code, etc. I would think there's value in any rational suggestions which include technical justification for the suggestion. -- Bill Davidsen "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/