Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CAAEC54EAA for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 02:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232742AbjA1Czl (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 21:55:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46514 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229681AbjA1Czj (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 21:55:39 -0500 Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com (szxga08-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.255]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D389B1717C for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:55:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from kwepemi500012.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4P3fCR0dt0z16Mn6; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 10:53:39 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.110.108] (10.67.110.108) by kwepemi500012.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.34; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 10:55:35 +0800 Message-ID: <0871074a-cafb-a172-f062-6ada6d2a3a41@huawei.com> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 10:55:34 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: kprobe: Fixup kernel panic when probing an illegal position To: , , , , , , CC: , , Guo Ren References: <20230126130509.1418251-1-guoren@kernel.org> From: "liaochang (A)" In-Reply-To: <20230126130509.1418251-1-guoren@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.110.108] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To kwepemi500012.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.12) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 在 2023/1/26 21:05, guoren@kernel.org 写道: > From: Guo Ren > > The kernel would panic when probed for an illegal position. eg: > > (CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C=n) > > echo 'p:hello kernel_clone+0x16 a0=%a0' >> kprobe_events > echo 1 > events/kprobes/hello/enable > cat trace > > Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack > is corrupted in: __do_sys_newfstatat+0xb8/0xb8 > CPU: 0 PID: 111 Comm: sh Not tainted > 6.2.0-rc1-00027-g2d398fe49a4d #490 > Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) > Call Trace: > [] dump_backtrace+0x38/0x48 > [] show_stack+0x50/0x68 > [] dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x84 > [] dump_stack+0x20/0x30 > [] panic+0x160/0x374 > [] generic_handle_arch_irq+0x0/0xa8 > [] sys_newstat+0x0/0x30 > [] sys_clone+0x20/0x30 > [] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x4 > ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: > Kernel stack is corrupted in: __do_sys_newfstatat+0xb8/0xb8 ]--- > > That is because the kprobe's ebreak instruction broke the kernel's > original code. The user should guarantee the correction of the probe > position, but it couldn't make the kernel panic. > > This patch adds arch_check_kprobe in arch_prepare_kprobe to prevent an > illegal position (Such as the middle of an instruction). > > Fixes: c22b0bcb1dd0 ("riscv: Add kprobes supported") > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren > --- > arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c > index f21592d20306..475989f06d6d 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c > @@ -48,6 +48,21 @@ static void __kprobes arch_simulate_insn(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs) > post_kprobe_handler(p, kcb, regs); > } > > +static bool __kprobes arch_check_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) > +{ > + unsigned long tmp = (unsigned long)p->addr - p->offset; > + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)p->addr; > + > + while (tmp <= addr) { > + if (tmp == addr) > + return true; > + > + tmp += GET_INSN_LENGTH(*(kprobe_opcode_t *)tmp); > + } > + > + return false; > +} LGTM. I have submit a patch to fix the same problem, found at: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230127130541.1250865-11-chenguokai17@mails.ucas.ac.cn/ So this boundary check is necessary no matter CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C is enable or not, right? > + > int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) > { > unsigned long probe_addr = (unsigned long)p->addr; > @@ -55,6 +70,9 @@ int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) > if (probe_addr & 0x1) > return -EILSEQ; > > + if (!arch_check_kprobe(p)) > + return -EILSEQ; > + > /* copy instruction */ > p->opcode = *p->addr; > -- BR, Liao, Chang